Plots(1)

The future for 17-year-old Marty McFly is not shaping up well. His family is dysfunctional, his schoolteacher, Mr Strickland, is out to get him, his music is just too loud and the rest of the world doesn't care. Only with his girlfriend, Jennifer Parker and local eccentric scientist, Dr. Emmet Brown does he find the encouragement and excitement he needs. Never in time for his classes or his dinner, one day Marty wasn't in his time at all but having the time of his life. But what time is it? Marty got home early last night - 30 years early. One of the not-so-crazy scientist's experiment went slightly wrong and Marty was caught up in it to find himself at the wheel of a DeLorean car - converted into a time machine. It roars back to 1955 where he meets his parents when they were his age and sets out to make a man out of his dim-wit father. (Universal Pictures UK)

(more)

Videos (3)

Trailer 1

Reviews (10)

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English One great thing has happened to me with this review, and I might be the only one among you. I am evaluating without any emotion, as it is only now that I have seen this film – in 2011. So no nostalgia. This film is very silly. If someone were to make something like this today, they would be crucified. Even Pirates of the Caribbean, silly as it is, is a little bit better than this (and it is also nonsense, by the way). ()

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English Had I seen it for the first time in my teenage years when I enjoyed similar stories, I would probably give it a definite five stars. Unfortunately, I watched Zemeckis' legendary sci-fi for the first time last week, which killed a bit of my enthusiasm. The story is very entertaining, some of the gags and situations are very nice, but I don’t really care for the "teenage spirit" and the unmistakable aesthetics of the 80's. Both of the title characters are really good, and the game with the influence of past actions on future things is also fun. This is a very successful hybrid with a great idea and a quality script. But aging… what can you do? ()

Ads

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English The film is based on the idea that it is possible to change our present by changing our past. Causality is respected here, of course, for the purposes of the screenplay, but in this case, it doesn't matter at all because it works perfectly. Additionally, there are two actors who give the film its soul. Michael J. Fox is an actor who you can't help but like, and Christopher Lloyd and his character Emmett Brown are so wonderfully eccentric that he has become a literal iconic mad scientist. Directed by Robert Zemeckis, this is truly a well-thought-out film that will entertain you, even if you're not a big fan of sci-fi. Among other things, Zemeckis shows what he has always excelled at - special effects sequences. They are truly well done, and one wouldn't even believe that the film is almost thirty years old. I was completely unnecessary in my fear of the film because it is really a great example of what fun and intelligent sci-fi can look like. ()

Stanislaus 

all reviews of this user

English I delayed watching Back to the Future perhaps too long, because I had already watched some time travel films, so Robert Zemeckis' breakthrough film did not impress me as much as it did the audience of that time. This is not to say that I didn't enjoy Marty's Journey to the Past and Back, but quite the opposite. I liked the setting and the concept of the 50s, and in fact the 80s stylization, which I like to return to in films (whether it be the setting or when the film was produced). The high school storyline doesn't outright surprise anyone, but it was hilarious to watch the confrontation between the 50s school kids and the 80s kid who was simply three decades "more advanced". Besides the scifi-comedy line, the film also appealed to me for its action, especially in the final quarter. Of the actors, I was most amused by the goofy Christopher Lloyd, but the others also had something going for them – the "modern" Michael J. Fox, the coyly sensual Lea Thompson or the endearingly awkward Crispin Glover. Perhaps the only thing that bothered me was the visible make-up of the actors/characters. Otherwise, I was satisfied with the film, even though I was unable to fully appreciate its qualities and cult status. ()

Othello 

all reviews of this user

English I like the admitted value connection here between the 50s and the 80s, where you're actually fighting for position in the bourgeois suburbs, not breaking out of it. Back to the Future is actually a Reaganesque ode to neighborhood and conservative certainties, where one can twist one's entire life in the right direction with a well-timed punch, while keeping one's integrity in check, and if there's one thing to rely on, it's science. Oh, and they're taking the invention of rock 'n' roll away from black people, which is actually fucking hilarious nowadays. I totally understand how seductive it must have been at the time and actually is now, especially since the movie has such perfect sequences (the concert!), exuberant acting (Lloyd!), and a great script. Value-wise, though, it's as much a guilty pleasure for me to watch the film as it is to be entertained by constructivist or normalization films. ()

Gallery (224)