Plots(1)

Attorney Matt Murdock (Ben Affleck) is blind, but his other four senses function with superhuman sharpness. By day, Murdock represents the downtrodden. At night, he is Daredevil, a masked vigilante stalking the dark streets of the city, a relentless avenger of justice. (20th Century Fox Home Entertainment)

Videos (2)

Trailer 2

Reviews (8)

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English If the rule applied that the better the villain, the better the movie, Daredevil would be the best comic book adaptation. But even Colin Farrell, who thoroughly enjoys his role as Bullseye, cannot save the unremarkable action. On the other hand, I can't say that I was bored, even though Affleck wanted to push me in that direction. Critics of Ben's acting always made me laugh, but here, unfortunately, he truly is a tragic blind hero. In combination with an unexpectedly overly romanticized central storyline and the absence of Daredevil's typical grittiness, this was a missed opportunity, and combined with the Elektra spin-off, it was a perfect blind alley. ()

DaViD´82 

all reviews of this user

English It’s been a long time that I have sympathized so much with the hero of a movie. I was incredibly jealous of Matt’s blindness - at least he doesn’t have to watch hogwash like this. On the other hand, I wouldn’t like to be gifted with his acute hearing, since I would probably have gone stark raving mad listening to the teen hit-parade soundtrack. That devil should be rotting in hell, with Johnson rotting with him. And they could take Jennifer Garner too, in fact the whole cast for good measure. Maybe only Farrell deserves to be left behind on the earth’s surface. In any case, this is a criminal failure at depicting one of the few engaging superheroes who, when approached seriously, darkly and in psychological noir style (hi there, Bendis), he doesn’t even need his action superhero alter ego. ()

Ads

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English An ordinary comic book adaptation with all the flaws of early millenium. Visually hyped, sprinkled with new technologies and gimmicks that were all the rage back, and of course full of clichés and pathos. In addition, the action is surprisingly often confusing. It's hard to say whether it's good or not, but this film always comes to mind whenever someone mentions Evanescence. Ben Affleck is ordinary and Jennifer Garner is for decoration. The interesting insights of the main protagonist and the director's cut also help with that. ()

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English I don't like Ben Affleck, and comic book adaptations that endlessly variate the decoction of Burton's Batman get on my nerves... that's why I don't really understand why I liked Daredevil so much. Perhaps because the blind hero is a nice guy, Farell is true to tradition excellent, the music is listenable, the choreography standard (albeit chaotic at times) and the atmosphere is decently darkened due to the tragedy at the end of the film. It cannot be overlooked that director Johnson is slightly above-average and does not offer us any great visual feasts, even using the gift of the main hero rather non-inventively. Despite this, Daredevil is a very pleasant and easily digestible film, which, while it cannot compete with the comic book elite, is good enough in its weight category. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English I liked it at the time. And even though Ben looks weird with highlights and kind of blind, I still think it's better than, for example, "Green Lantern". I enjoyed the movie in the cinema years ago, mainly because there weren't as many comic book adaptations back then, even though movies of this kind were already on the rise with less cliched scripts and characters. Fortunately, the comic showed me that this character is not to be condemned. In addition, thanks to this, I fell for Jennifer Garner. But Ben was faster... ()

Gallery (189)