Sahara

Oh, that was painful! Sahara is the type of movie to watch on TV when you come home, tired after a day's work, your mind is working at about one-fifth capacity and you desperately need something to fall asleep to. But if you don't want to sleep and, on the contrary, want to enjoy a pleasant two hours of no-brainer fun, you're in for a disappointment. Even if you can get over the fact that a massive armoured ship colossus from the American civil war is in the middle of the African desert, that one toxic factory can cause a total global ecological apocalypse and a bunch of other bullshit, you haven't won yet. You’ll still have to digest the pile of clichés in the script, which reminded me of my childhood creations around the age of ten when I attempted to write an adventure novel. But that's still not all. Then you have to deal with Penelope Cruz and her monotonous acting (even visually this lady never captivated me) and Steve Zahn's dumbass jokes in his usual position as a jerk. Thankfully, McConaughey's charisma makes this schlock at least somewhat watchable, and William H. Macy delights with an artful performance that is so far removed from his typical wimpy underdogs. But that’s a weak compensation. (24/10/2005)

Sahara is a case of a film so incredibly silly that it's laughable and functions as an unintentional crazy comedy. Giving such nonsense only one star is disrespectful, as it's tremendously entertaining - just in a somewhat different way than the creators intended. Stuffing such a heap of absurdities into the screenplay deserves admiration for its audacity alone. For a moment, I closed my eyes and listened to the dialogues, as well as the sound effects of gunfire and engine noises in the film. That alone was enough to have me in stitches... Overall impression: 20%. (05/01/2008)

Average, average, and more average. And it's certainly not as good as the book, which is excellent. I don't know why, but it seemed to me that each of the actors was only putting half the effort in. Yet McConaughey is a good fit for Dirk Pitt - unfortunately, he hasn't lent him anything but his body (which, as a straight man, is not good enough for me). Penélope Cruz is the same, but I like her better, Steve Zahn was annoying most of the time, but I can't deny him a few (I guess only two) good jokes. The best of all is William H. Macy in an uncharacteristic boss role. As far as the action scenes are concerned, they were handled quite well, the atmosphere of the desert helps the film a lot, the African villains are not bad either... It's just that the script smacks of stupidity here and there. Two and a half stars. (08/10/2009)

It took me half an hour before it fully hit me that I was watching one of the worst movies of recent times. But in the end, I endured Sahara diligently, because I could not believe that such a group of people could commit themselves to this. An avalanche of logical gaps, unrelated situations, and insane dialogues with a dysfunctional action finale. Unfortunately, they succeeded. One star for Panama. (20/02/2007)

I personally imagine Dirk Pitt's role to be someone older, maybe just because in Clive Cussler's stories, he is roughly ten years older than Matthew McConaughey here, but I got over the initial mistrust and he, as the main star of the film, gives a fairly measured performance and fits quite well into the summer high-budget blockbuster that Sahara undoubtedly is. Don't expect a complex screenplay or well-developed characters, Sahara is meant to entertain, and it succeeds quite well. The action is shot perfectly and thankfully, there is not an overload of it, so it doesn't feel like a disruptive element. The exotic setting of Africa fits perfectly, and the director serves us a fairly decent piece of filmmaking with a well-chosen pace that you can consume in one breath, regardless of their opinion in the end. (20/10/2005)