Plots(1)

The Ring 2 is set six months after the terrifying events of the first film. Rachel (Naomi Watts) has taken her son Aidan (David Dorfman) to the peaceful mountain resort of Astoria, where she takes a job on a local newspaper. When she discovers a case of a teenage murder victim, Rachel begins to suspect that the sinister videotape is responsible. Tracking down the tape, Rachel is quick to destroy it. But when her son slips into a coma, Rachel comes to believe that this might be the actions of the vengeful ghost, although for the local community it is beginning to look as if Rachel has been abusing her child. Returning to Seattle, Rachel begins a desperate race against time to uncover the secrets of the ghost's past, before it can use her son to cross over into this reality. (Paramount Home Entertainment)

(more)

Videos (2)

Trailer 1

Reviews (6)

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English Same cassette, same Rachel and Aidan, same gloomy "neither night nor day" atmosphere, same musical background. And Nakata didn't manage it the same way. The plot itself is already absurd, and from the trailer, it is more or less clear that the film has to fall apart at some point, which eventually happens with the unnecessary detour to Samara's mother. However, it is precisely the connection to the visual style of the first film that gives a sense of a cohesive story. Moreover, when I remember the deer or the fateful well, it immediately gives me goosebumps and convinces me that the second Ring is definitely not the disaster it promised to be. However, I wouldn't venture into further experiments because the aura of the first film could develop a dangerous crack. ()

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English Solidly shot wholes/half-parts clash with utterly incompetently shot details in this aesthetically very uneven work. But the camera impotence and the inability to captivate are nothing compared to the stupidity of the script, which has more logical errors than holes in Swiss cheese. And even the idea itself – if it can be called that at all – is rather laughable. ()

Ads

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English I was prepared to be disappointed by The Ring Two, but I didn’t expect that I wouldn’t even feel like reviewing it. At the beginning, there are still some promising directions that the story could take, but as the film subsequently serves up clichéd and nonsensical scenes, the viewer loses trust and eventually stops caring by the end. It’s the complete opposite arc of the first film. The screenplay is just contrived fluff that attempts at all costs to find something to from the previous movie’s subject matter to grab hold of. The character of Samara no longer has any gravitas, the fear aspect works at 30% capacity (whereas it worked at 90% in the first one) and often fails due to the director’s reliance on digital effects, which he hadn’t been able to afford previously and which are unfortunately completely gratuitous. The only positives: the initial “supernatural feeling” culminating in the great scene with deer, decent cinematography, an excellent Hans Zimmer central motif and the always pretty Naomi Watts. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English "Ring 2" marked the beginning of the decline in interest in Japanese horror. It was a gradual decline because even today there are still people who seek out Japanese supernatural stories, but the interest is no longer as huge. It's logical. Hideo Nakata is just repeating himself in the film "Ring 2" and trying to come up with an interesting ending, but he gets lost in the whole sense of the story. And the worst part is that the only scene that is frightening is the one with the deer. ()

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English A typical sequel. The screenwriters apparently decided to give the first part a good beating, they wanted everything to be even more gripping, shocking and scary, but somehow it didn’t go beyond the effort. The Ring 2 doesn't have nearly the atmosphere of fear that Verbinski's film could boast, all the scares are forced and unsuccessful, the director serves one cliché after another, ultimately drowning the great performances and plot potential. The story digs its own grave from the beginning, sinking deeper and deeper into it, despite the great effort to scare the viewer and keep a true horror face. A big pompous sequel trying to capitalize on the success of the excellent first one, which, while watchable, is still best avoided. ()

Gallery (37)