The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford

It’s been a long time since I first saw this movie. Back then, I hadn’t yet been exposed to all the best western movies and so I rated it three stars. But now I thought that this movie couldn’t have been so bad and so I’ve risked watching the 153 minutes again. At that point, I minded the overly lengthy watch time once again, but I enjoyed the Pitt vs Affleck acting performances so much more. I was also enjoying the movie’s atmosphere along with the story itself and the best thing about it was the music by Nick Cave who had a few cameos himself. This movie is very original. I get the differing opinions: either you like it a lot or not. Either you respect its originality or not. At first I just respected it, but now I have to say that as far as cinematography goes, I enjoyed some of the moments a whole lot as well. (13/07/2014)

A slow, but smoothly told story of fate, in which you know the end of all the characters the moment they are introduced at the beginning as a bunch of primitive rednecks hungry for money. Dominik's direction, coupled with Deakins' cinematography, has an almost hypnotic effect, and the film rides (thanks also to Nick Cave’s score) on a wave of feeling rather than shaking the colts damnably low. Pitt acts "only" by constantly pitying them and Affleck's slimy rat - you hate, you understand, and on and on. Either way, he’s the one who owns this film. It’s too bad the director isn't as good at creating relationships between the characters (briskness) as he is at atmosphere because then it would have been brilliant. This way it stayed just below the higher review scores. (02/02/2009)

If I had to use only one word to describe this film, I’d probably choose "captivating". A narrative flowing so seamlessly that I wouldn't have cut a single frame, and this is a 150-minute voyage completely outside Hollywood mainstream, where little editing, expressions that replace dozens of words and arty shots of the natural scenery, the kind which in Gladiator sounded like a few balladic lines in conventional mass prose, are the order of the day in almost every scene and form the characteristic meditative symbolism of the whole work. And when it's time to get verbal, the two wonderful leading actors make a powerful statement, and from the beginning they sparkle incredibly, and the level of their personal conflict works perhaps as well as it ever could – Affleck is a perfectly weird and unpredictable bastard, Pitt is incredibly charismatic and exudes such inner strength that I'd probably put on a mankini and declare my love to my high school maths teacher if he told me to. Except for the emotionally indifferent ending of their duel, which didn't satisfy me maybe because even Jesse himself, despite his charisma, is just a bastard you can hardly find your way to, this film deserves only praise. Deakins does a standard ethereal and therefore probably academically unappreciated job, the music will stay in your head long after the screening, and Andrew Dominik suffered a bout of filmmaking creativity that, with any luck, he will repeat. A different western, but more progressive than any other genre work in many years. (12/02/2017)

Brad Pitt gave one of the best performances of his career, and if Andrew Dominic hadn't made it so long, this might have been one of his best movies. The unnecessary rambling of the story takes away from its intensity and distracts from the main plot. I guess that's the only thing that bothered me. The other actors do their best, too, and Casey Affleck is either a great actor or a total douche in reality. Ford is an ugly figure, and even the ending couldn't redeem him in any way. He did what he did, and I didn't care at all that he regretted it. A young naïve fool who wanted to become famous and killed his friend. In a cowardly way, from behind, and for no fundamental reason. We shouldn't kill our heroes, we should look up to them. A very strong four star rating. (18/03/2008)

An artistic western is in itself a combination that I would consider an oxymoron rather than anything else. Well, this film didn't change my mind about it. The comparison with Terrence Malick is quite fitting because the pace is similar. Yes, there is so much hidden beneath the surface, it certainly is a gem, as some say. I just have a feeling that the creators wanted to make something out of the western genre that it is not, and so they didn't really make a western at all, but rather an artistic biography with subtext. Talking about tension here simply isn't possible. I don't understand Dominik's perspective on the world and I don't even have the desire to understand. I would actually believe that the original novel would be more interesting to read. (25/03/2014)