Star Trek

  • USA Star Trek (more)
Trailer 4
USA / Germany, 2009, 127 min

Directed by:

J.J. Abrams

Cinematography:

Dan Mindel

Composer:

Michael Giacchino

Cast:

Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Leonard Nimoy, Eric Bana, Bruce Greenwood, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldana, Simon Pegg, John Cho, Anton Yelchin, Ben Cross, Winona Ryder (more)
(more professions)

Plots(1)

In Star Trek, the film chronicles the early years in the life of James T. Kirk and his fellow USS Enterprise crew members, including Kirk's enrolment at Starfleet Academy, his first meeting with Spock and their battles with time-travelling Romulans from the future. (Paramount Home Entertainment)

Videos (16)

Trailer 4

Reviews (12)

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English Well, I really wasn’t expecting this. I personally considered myself the last person who would proclaim to be a Star Trek fan, and I never sought it out on TV either, but Abrams has done something that I wouldn’t have believed just a few hours ago, he’s made me a fan! Say what you will, but this was better and more entertaining than all of Star Wars (except maybe the third one), and I was mesmerized watching what was unfolding in front of me. I don't think anyone doubts that the visual effects are bombastic, but I still have to give them a special praise because they were really a feast for the eyes. The music is also perfect, each motif has something to it and adds an even more spectacular touch to the action on the screen. And the simple but extremely effective story is like a lasso for every genre fan, it ties them up tight and only lets them go when the closing credits start rolling, when they are out of breath. As it should be. Why would we want to think during a film and endure would-be unexpected scripted kicks to the groin, when we can relax, put a pillow under our heads and enjoy 120 minutes of uninterrupted modern action, freshened up by wisecracking heroes, beautiful heroines (there's that Saldana again!) and an immensely talented director who is far from having the last word? That would be stupid. 100% ()

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English Abrams's directing style and mise-en-scène construction is at the very least grandiose. What I admired in MI3 is also here, and once again there’s plenty to look at. Monstrous shots of the whole scenery, camera swoops, and monumentality complemented by a fast-paced and entertaining story is an excellent and powerful combination. Unfortunately, I'm not a Star Trek fan, so some things somehow escaped me. Nevertheless, I dare say that as a standalone Star Trek film, it can work quite well. Some plot twists were on the edge of acceptability, but in terms of drive, action, and entertainment, it's top-notch. No bullshit and absolutely uncompromising, just as we expect from Abrams. ()

Ads

Isherwood 

all reviews of this user

English "Is there a doctor here? I need urgent help for a die-hard Star Trek fan!" said a guy two rows above me after the film was over. I understood what he meant. I wasn't expecting anything soulful from Orci and Kurtzman, but if Abrams wasn’t this good at his craft, the rest of the people in the movie theater would certainly not have enjoyed it as much. He traded the naivety of this space saga for an unbelievable barrage of catchphrases, action, and visual orgies, which he endowed with so much warp that I literally suffered on the way home in a speeding carriage. The perfect casting and the amazing work by the ILM guys are just the icing on the cake. This was two hours of pleasure. ()

DaViD´82 

all reviews of this user

English Several hundred flashes, a tattooed Bana and two Spocks. JJ began this nicely from scratch and not only did he manage to breathe life into a long-dead legend, he also resuscitated the half-forgotten space opera genre as a whole. Abrams and Giacchino get the adrenalin pumping, the wonderfully cast (while criminally unexploited) crew bristles with charisma, but the stupidity of the screenplay (however much it might be intentional) trips everybody up like at an ice-hockey match. And I haven’t yet got over how the nearer it gets to the end, the more it slips into the classic Star Trek template, but it does wear a technical cloak that is very impressive in view of the year this was made. Yes, although it’s logical that in the end it assumes the form that we know so well, but from that moment on it stopped being at all interesting. ()

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English After successfully watching all the feature-length adventures of the old crew, I smiled indulgently at the passion of all the Trekkies and welcomed the restart of their adventures mainly because of Abrams behind the camera. When a tear dropped at Kirk's birth, I became uncertain, but I attributed it mainly to the huge emotional intensity of the opening minutes. But when another tear dropped just because Leonard Nimoy appeared on the screen, I realized that despite all possible objections, I am a fan who devours every minute. Whether it's breathtaking ice adventures, a smile at the fact that Čechov had an amazing accent from the first minutes on the Enterprise, or the realization that James Tiberius Kirk is cool even without Shatner's charisma. A week after the screening, it is ultimately 90%. I rejoice at the registration into the Starfleet, and perhaps only the first adventure of promising novices could have been a bit more original than a confrontation with an angry avenger. But something tells me that the second time around, it will be at maximum warp. P.S.: The second screening definitively revealed a spectacle without a dull moment. Hopefully, no blockbuster deserved a new series like the voyages of the USS Enterprise. ()

Gallery (152)