Venom

To begin with, I certainly acknowledge the fury of the viewers who are comic-book fans and have a tendency to whine whenever their favourite hero in a film picks their nose with the wrong hand. The PG13 rating is of course a big punch in the dick of everyone with a long relationship with Venom, and I certainly understand that a buddy comedy doesn’t fit well with horror with a cosmic parasite, but whatever. Fortunately, I was able to accept the fact that this would not be about fate, thick atmosphere and stylish kills, so I dulled my brain and had great fun. I don’t agree at all with the opinions that the beginning is slower than a week at school. On the contrary, the pace is nice, the humour is not toe-curling, Hardy is great from the start and it was nice for a change to see a pure and unpretentious comic-book flick not overwhelmed with CGI sets or dozens of characters. Surely, I could probably point out to the oversimplification of the relationships between the characters or the continuity of the twists (it’s clear that they cut out a lot), but I was all the more impressed that even on this lighter and more straightforward level, the film works just fine, clearly fleshes out the characters' motives and just doesn't bore. The interaction between Venom and Eddie is a prank that the creators deliver well and at the right moments – and a lot of the credit goes to the excellent Hardy, whom I like a bit more now, and honestly I can think of only one other actor who would entertain me so much with his lively performance in every film, Jack Nicholson he’s called (though I don’t want to compare, no way). 70%, and I’m taking down a star after some time, it’s not that well executed and unfortunately, it’s not bad enough to be worthy of a guilty 4*. (09/10/2018)

One of Marvel's most interesting characters finally made it to the silver screen, but it deserved a better story, a little better execution, and overall better care. Such an entertaining, strong and hard-nosed antihero could have been handled much better than waiting a third of the film, getting to know him a third and then lurking in front of a green screen for a while. Hardy does a decent job in the role of a weird journalist, but his digital counterpart is considerably worse. Boring. 20 minutes in, and you know how it's going to end, and of course there's going to be a final battle, because you usually can't do without that in comic book adaptations these days. So predictable. (07/01/2019)

Everything good about this movie is actually thanks to Tom Hardy. This Marvel movie would have ended up in the abyss of history without Tom Hardy and nobody would have ever remembered it. In this way, however, it’s a decent introduction of a new character of the Marvel universe, but it pays brutally for the naïve screenplay. While I accepted the fact that Venom is actually a distant cousin of the Goa'ulds from Stargate SG-1, I really struggled with accepting the simplicity of the screenplay, according to which the tired and disappointed Tom Hardy meets with his buddy Venom. Riz Ahmed isn’t a completely dignified adversary for Venom either; he’s rather an easy ticket into our world, which he surprisingly grew to like. Being a crazy scientist is quite a popular topic which doesn’t get old easily. What could get old are the typical tropes Marvel is already full of. Thankfully, Venom is strong because of Tom Hardy and even Venom himself understood that. And at least because of that I have a reason to look forward to the next installment. (08/10/2018)

I would like to say that in places Tom Hardy acts as poorly as Ben Affleck in Daredevil or Edward Norton in The Incredible Hulk, but that wouldn't be true. His performance is much closer to Nicolas Cage in Ghost Rider. In places it’s so bad that it's fun. I really wasn't sure if Hardy was grimacing because it's supposed to be funny, or because it's supposed to be serious (but in doing so, it's just inadvertently funny). The film is not terrible, but it is no gem either. I didn't mind at all, for example, that it didn't splash blood and heads were not flying, I much prefer it when filmmakers work with hints. The action scenes were quite solid (especially the one with the tactical unit) and the villain was also decent. Worse, however, was that everything in Venom seemed terribly hurried, and when the “grand finale" came, I almost didn't recognize it. (06/10/2018)

Venom is getting a lot of hate so far, because critics on RottenTomatoes gave it an average rating of only 4.3, but on IMDB it's a rather satisfactory 7.0, so again it looks like the audience is mostly satisfied, only the critics are grumbling, but they always do when it's not a sophisticated drama, musical or cheap indie. Personally I wasn't expecting much, but Ruben Fleischer, director of Zombieland and Gangster Squad, has once again pleasantly surprised me. It's a shame it’s not R-rated, but it still looks pretty gritty and dark even without the blood. The opening half hour is slightly slower, but once Tom Hardy meets Venom (the scene in the lab is atmospherically horrific), the film becomes an action adrenaline ride to the end that doesn't let off the gas. Tom Hardy's performance is different than ever before and he's surprisingly very funny, and those who like the guy will like him even more after this. Venom's voice is also great and his looks are perfect. The action is great, even though it often takes place in the dark, it's still suspenseful, gritty enough and with decent cinematography. So my only criticisms are the mediocre villain and the rather underwhelming finale, but I had a great time and that's what comic-book movies are all about. Woody Harrelson as Carnage is going to be awesome. The theater was packed, I hope the film succeeds financially. 75% (04/10/2018)