Oblivion

The most interesting ideas from the best sci-fi fantasy movies blended like a smoothie from Jamba. Cruise plays a human version of Wall-E, but thanks to a large amount of evolution leaps, he has become the biggest boss on the planet. Other cast members worth a mention (apart from Morgan, he never disappoints) include the new discovery Andrea Riseborough, who won my heart in the scene in the pool. Paradoxically, Olga isn’t so impressive in this movie. But what makes Oblivion such a unique movie is the visual side. In terms of design, everything is very novel, it has the right massive scale and the final trip, combined with reminiscing about how it all began, is something so audiovisually/sci-fi-wise perfect (I want Kosinski to film “Rendezvous with Rama", or something by Asimov), that I was tempted to give it a fifth star. It bothered me a little bit that M83’s music wasn’t as wow was expected. It reminds me a lot of TDK and Tron, even so it sets a more than decent standard among the competition. P.S.: I was completely alone in the largest screen in the theater = no interference. :) (23/04/2013)

What’s more important for a film, to tell a story or to visualise it? Both are, no doubt; there’s no objective answer, and yet, in the lay debates among film fans the prevailing idea is that an exceptionally narrated story = elaborated art, and perfect visuals = just expensive commerce. That’s often the case, of course, but we shouldn’t generalise. Oblivion is a film with amazing visuals, with this I don’t mean that it “looks expensive”, I’m judging the aesthetics of images and scenes – the swimming pool scene will be one of the highlights of the year. To some extent, it’s similar to Prometheus – you can pick on the details of the story until the end of days, if that’s your thing, but the source of an aesthetic experience lies elsewhere, as does the source of an intellectual one. Oblivion is smart sci-fi (actually, there hasn’t been such pure sci-fi for a long time, fans of Clark must be happy!) that in its higher level offers a lot of food for thought – the good side of all proper sci-fi, greetings to Star Wars… :D PS: I want Kosinski to adapt “Rendezvous with Rama”!!! (21/04/2013)

Kosinski is still a much better designer than the narrator, but I'm quite pleased that, unlike Tron, the action scenes have massive energy. What are still miserable are the dialogues, especially the key ones, cut boringly in shots / counter-shots sequences. It feels like there was a comic book first. Kosinski sculpturally frames the characters somewhere and then lets them chant a text, which unfortunately lacks speech bubbles for being iconic and striking. Like all of the objects in Oblivion, the actors act more for aesthetic purposes. And you know what? I don't give a fuck. The scale is epic, clean and shiny, the clinical and illuminated visual is breathtaking in every detail, the hypnotic sound waves of M83 give it an inconvenient depth... I consider the first half an hour or so to be the captivating audiovisual trip that I expect from current sci-fi films (and usually don't get). As soon as the inevitable comes along and the story unfolds, Oblivion drowns in the familiar twists and unfinished ideas (will anyone pay Duncan Jones his royalties?)... but the action goes away, the image is overflowing with the sort of pomp I haven't seen in a long time (forget the experiments by Prometheus that are short of breath) and those few noticeably unsuccessful attempts to "make a thrilling story" will be destroyed by the bulldozer of the ultimate design. Finally, I understand what some viewers liked about Tron - Oblivion is also a brilliantly designed "sci-fi musical", this time with music that drew me in and sometimes, in collaboration with the image, gave me a taste of unadulterated euphoria from the big screen. It can be seen that it was supposed to be / wanted to be more than just a breathtaking spectacle, that someone wanted to move the promising indie trend of intelligent sci-fi to a blockbuster format and buried it with "fanzine" storytelling... but sometimes even a failed intention can offer enough space for spectator delight. Oblivion and I are an effective team. [75%] (15/04/2013)

Lots of mysterious promises, but (mainly because of the stupid trailers) few surprises, lots of questions, but few answers (i.e., few answers that don't feel like they've been hastily pulled out of thin air)... Fortunately, everything is impressively crafted, the design of all the machines, buildings and weapons is a joy to behold, Tom Cruise is likeable, whilst the music is pleasantly meditative, though nothing memorable. Three and a half stars. I preferred Elysium, which didn't try to be something it wasn’t for most of its duration. (11/10/2014)

Based on the trailer, I was expecting the same concept as Prometheus, that is, a visually spectacular and utterly captivating experience for sci-fi lovers that in the end is not nearly as sophisticated as we would like. But Oblivion is different, it is much more minimalist and modest, with its biggest weakness being Joseph Kosinski as a screenwriter. I believe he did his best, but he is a much better director than a writer. The biggest drawback in terms of the script, in my opinion, is the fact that they drew inspiration from older films such as Independence Day or The Matrix. Some years ago, we would have been amazed, but things are different today. However, Kosinski confirmed his role as an incredibly talented visionary in terms of audiovisual execution, and many scenes are literally breathtaking, the scene in the pool for example, in combination with perfect lighting, music, and sound, provides the ultimate feeling of excitement and cinematic experience. Similar feats could also be seen in Tron: Legacy. Kosinski knows how to create a different world where the viewer is willing to forget for a moment about their own, only a very few filmmakers can do this. (27/04/2013)