A Royal Affair

Nordic cinema has definitely become popular in recent times, and even though Denmark is not exactly a Scandinavian country, it is very close to them. This is evident in the film, which is truly surprising. If you look at this year's Oscar nominations, you will find that foreign language films are not lacking. Why is this? First and foremost, it is because it is a film. Not everyone can master the craft, not everyone can transform a script into a believable story. Historical drama is quite challenging to bring to the screen because it must be believable. Historical events must fit together, costumes, scenery, transportation, furniture, everyday items, the environment, everything must evoke a sense that we are truly in the past and that we are witnessing the described period, in this case, the second half of the 18th century. In the film "Royal Affair," everything looks truly perfect, but that is not a guarantee that the film will be perfect in other aspects as well. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2013/02/kralovska-afera-2012-85.html (15/03/2013)

Satisfaction in every way. Who would have thought that such a small European film from Danish history could please us so much? We know that our experience of the Enlightenment was not exactly a walk in the Garden of Eden, so why not feel more European thanks to our common roots? Virtually no European country has had anything to merit progress, so the social unrest of the last three centuries is just the result of honest disillusionment. And that's what this film is about. And as a bonus, of course, there's the sharply cut face of Mads Mikkelsen, who can play any role and it will always have a charge of forbidden delight. Plus, of course, the excellent sets, costumes, and drama. (21/08/2012)

The film features a quality cast. Mads Mikkelsen has rightfully gained recognition among viewers worldwide. The direction is decent, albeit conservative, but the weakness of the film is the screenplay, which cannot avoid excessive melodrama and black-and-white characters, as well as the schematic and simplistic depiction of historical processes. It's a 3-and-a-half-star rating, but considering the subject matter and my connection to enlightenment, this time I lean toward a higher rating. Overall impression: 70%. (01/10/2013)

Solid work in every way, but perhaps too solid and classic. For me, the film was lacking anything that would easily provoke and break the nobility, predictability and didactic nature. However, it must be admitted that in grasping the theme of the Enlightenment (egalitarianism) and the defense of the rights of ordinary people against the arbitrariness of the nobility and the Church, this film goes much further than Ridley Scott's latest films, at least because it focuses on the practical side of equality and challenges the character of the "liberator". In addition, it works well as a love triangle - particularly the character of King Christian is great and can be viewed in different ways. Even though it's very dumbed-down and sometimes too melodramatic, it's still a film that's worth it - it doesn't offend, it doesn't think of the viewer as an idiot, and it tries to think indirectly about current problems. The result is cautious, but quite sympathetic. (05/04/2012)

A very nice movie about a very interesting historical event. I would really love to know how today’s Danes look at this part of their history. The performances are flawless and overall it’s so perfectly tuned that I never got bored, in spite of it pretty long run – and I’m certainly not a fan of historical dramas. Who is crazy? The King or someone who sincerely believes the world was created in six days? (14/12/2012)