Die Hard 2

It's hard to tell how that Bruce does it, but he gets me every time. John McClane's character is one of his most successful. Even though he doesn't make me cry here like he did in Armageddon, I'm still glued to the screen and drooling. John always knows what to say and he always knows what to do. To me, he's a hero whose every move I trust. And it wouldn't be the same if he didn't throw in a good line here and there. The best in the most over-the-top situations, eh...? Since I have a thing for airports, I like this one a little bit more than the first one. 4.5 stars. (20/08/2011)

Harlin did it right and his rendering of the "Diehard poetics" is completely different from the previous work, more expansive in terms of the plot, and much more formally sweeping. The action he filmed may have lost some of the elegant realism of McTiernan, but the quantity scores full marks this time, and McLane is sent into action that has no close rivals. On the other hand, it should be noted that John McLane has lost the initial charm of his personality, with which he dazzled action fans in his time, but Bruce Willis is still simply hotshot No. 1. At the beginning when he incredulously utters "How does the same shit happen to the same guy twice?", people need to realize that Harlin takes it all with a healthy detachment, occasionally winking ironically at viewers who are in the right mood. I can’t help but give it a perfect score. (24/09/2006)

A 1990s example of a faithful genre flick that adds new ammo to a worn out template with allusions to new technologies, the obsolescence of McClane’s methods, and the direct clash of the old school (represented by McClane inside the story, as well as the 1980s action drive on the surface) with these newcomers (a hacker’s threat and the self-aware wink and homage to predecessors). The narrative is perfectly structured into several small blocks and it manages to retain the coherent impression of the first one, the action scenes are all entertaining (save for a couple of surprising exceptions), the development of the villains makes sense and Willis drops wisecracks as if his life depended on it. The golden 90s at their best, but with a slightly worn-out package. Harlin was good. 90% (10/04/2019)

The action poetics is absolutely fantastic and the end result is excellent. It's no wonder, because only aces were involved in Die Hard 2. Renny Harlin directed it, Stuart Baird edited, Oliver Wood was the cameraman, and the cast of actors is also impressive. The action is, of course, brilliant and blood is really not spared. Script-wise, it’s more ambitious and much less predictable, while still occasionally being literally an action exhibition. The airport is an attractive setting, and if we add professional mercenaries, marines, a drug baron, and a stubborn airport police captain to the mix, we have a plot for three movies together. McLane is just as badass as in the Nakatomi building and keeps delivering one tough wisecrack after another. This is how a golden action gem of the 90s should look like. (28/09/2006)

"Another basement, another elevator. How is it possible that it happens twice?" The first installment is a well-deserved cult, but I have to go against the stream and praise the second part, Die Harder, even more. Harlin starts from scratch, letting McClane be vulnerable again as a cop who occasionally gets shaken up, and naturally handles the transition into a rescuer with ease, which is both natural and surprisingly well-developed. The situation, reminiscent of Nakatomi Plaza, is intensified by the airport setting. The only advantage that the previous adventure retains is in the main villain, as the airport phantom is not of the same caliber as Hans, but rather a sadistic bad guy. Die Harder is a bit better than the first mainly because of the action, which looks even rougher and more graceful than in its older sibling. 90% (16/06/2007)