Barefoot

Filming is something Jan Svěrák hasn't forgotten how to do, but creating picturesque images and working with a retro atmosphere alone is not enough for a fulfilling cinematic experience. You also need a functional screenplay. I don't know why Jan didn't utilize his father's abilities, who is one of the best screenwriters of the last decades. Barefoot does not work, and when I use this term, I really mean it doesn't work from a dramaturgical standpoint. Even though Jan Svěrák fills his film with plenty of stuff, in the end, it is incredibly empty. You don't just need memories, you have to piece them together properly. This film is helped to a considerable extent by sentiment, but I won't assist it in that, as there are plenty of others who can. Overall impression: 45%. I can't help but have a reservation about Oldřich Kaiser's casting. Even though there is not a big age difference between Vetchý and Kaiser, the years when Kaiser was drinking heavily have unfortunately taken their toll on him, so he could actually play Vetchý's father. By the way, both he and Ondřej Vetchý are slightly too old for Tereza Voříšková and their little son... The scene by the pond, where Voříšková and Kaiser exchange a long, emotionally charged gaze, and in which it is evident that the director wants to evoke in the viewer the impression of either a platonic or fulfilled past relationship, brings to mind associations with pedophilia more than anything else. (17/09/2017)

I wanted to like it so badly. I was ready to enjoy the expected heartwarming drama and vise-like kindness, but unfortunately I got a film where that is completely absent. In fact, there's almost nothing there. It looks nice, and as far as the production design and costumes goes, I can't fault Barefoot at all, but in all other respects it's wretched. And a mess. The film goes from nowhere to nowhere, and although it is framed by a period and bites into some interesting conflicts, eighty percent of the running time is ultimately completely useless. Trying to cram in as many "flashbacks" as possible results in there being no time for anything and because of that, the humor doesn't work, the drama doesn't work, and the poignancy doesn't work. Most of the time I felt like someone had dropped two minutes of a scene that should have been fifteen minutes long, and I have little idea why I should be watching the boys tackle a classmate, that Eda might get a slap on the wrist, that the dad is at odds with his brother, and that a pigeon has gone missing. There's never time to pay attention to anything properly and the result is such a nice looking film where there's an awful lot going on, but for most of it you'll probably ask yourself why you don't really care about any of it. Too bad. (21/08/2017)

It has some magical moments that prove that Svěrák Jr. is a really good director. I appreciate the view of the war through children's eyes, but the story is too disjointed; it needed a unifying line. The story of Uncle Wolf, which was supposed to cement the narrative, isn't enough to pull the whole film together. It's a shame, I really wanted to love this film. (01/01/2019)

You know that you are watching a very well done film from the 2nd WW period, but at the same time you feel that there is basically no story. And I would be ok with that if only the character played by Oldřich Kaiser (who is getting better with every role) wasn’t made the most interesting one and basically holds the whole story together but then it is killed off in the most disgusting manner towards the end of the film. And this end was my biggest Czech movie disappointment in a very long time. (04/01/2018)

The film didn't disappoint me outright, but I had hoped it would be even funnier, with more humor from Zdeněk Svěrák, but it's a bit weaker in that regard. As a nostalgic film, it works, especially thanks to the great child characters. The storyline revolving around the character of Vlk (Oldřich Kaiser) had much more potential within it. (20/08/2017)