Us

After the fame-fair, the sanctimony, the back-slapping, the accolades, and the paternalistic labeling as "Black Hitchcock" (or later, more appropriately, "the first Peele"), one might have expected that this filmmaker's next script would simply be overdeveloped. There's a very strong sense of the thorough research into the horror genre that Peele had clearly done before. This is noticeable here not only in the references and quotations, which are thankfully sparse, but especially in the structure and formal elements. The immobilization of the head of the family right at the beginning is borrowed from Funny Games (here, however, via a baseball bat instead of a golf club, which does make a mess later in the film), the threat of tailor's scissors from the French Inside, work with a second plan ala It Follows, evil sealed in underground tunnels, see for example, Barker's The Midnight Meat Train, and the home invasion genre that climbs from the surface of a single house to somewhere beyond the metaphysical framework brings to mind, again, the French Martyrs. These reminders of the New French Extreme period specifically are what do Us the greatest disservice, because like in Get Out, there is a reluctance to work with violence, which is, however, one of the essential ingredients of the HI thriller. Imagining how the blood would have flowed off the screen during the scene of the families being slaughtered in the second house if it had been filmed in France sometime around 2009 unfortunately leaves a sense of reservation. This is actually linked to the second problem, namely that despite the relatively radical twists and turns the script offers in its concept, the film contains no downright radical genre scenes. Something like the opening shotgun entrance in Martyrs, the circular saw scene in Frontier(s), or the motorcycle finale in the Evil Dead remake. These problems are then what keep Us from five stars, because otherwise, like Get Out, it's really a breath of life into a moribund horror genre whose work with gradation, a dose of twists, and working with pop culture (using the Hands Across America initiative to make a point? FTW!) is something to be cherished. The last shot, with Minnie Riperton's "Les Fleurs", almost won that fifth star. (25/06/2019)

Is it possible that this was made by the creator of the brilliant Get Out?! Us does not work on any level as an attempt at horror with certain (perhaps philosophical?!) overtones. Though it is a technically flawless Hollywood movie, it is laughable and unbelievable in terms of its content. Scenes that are supposed to be scary are instead embarrassing to the point of being ridiculous; the dialogue, which is supposed to be wittily cool, is unnatural and silly. There is seemingly an attempt at an interesting existential element in the uncovering of the story’s mystery, but it turns out to be WTF nonsense. It’s as if the sophisticated violin of Shyamalan’s early originality and Stephen King’s thematic distinctiveness were supposed to be employed here, but there was only enough talent for a child’s ukulele with half of its strings missing. (16/10/2020)

With this grotesquely warped horror movie reminiscent of The Twilight Zone, Jordan Peele has confirmed his position as an illustrious talent in the field of genre films. In Us, those who are so inclined can see a provocative parallel to the basic principle of capitalism, i.e. the presumed right to privilege and living life at the expense of someone else, which brings out the dark side of people. At the same time, however, it is simply a great, original horror flick that is not satisfied with the superficial tricks with which most current contributions to the genre are inundated. (01/04/2019)

For the first three quarters, the second film of Jordan Peele gave me a “fuller” horror experience than his début Get Out. It has first-rate craftsmanship, a brilliant premise, excellent performances led by Lupita Nyongo, and the humour is better incorporated and not intruding. Us was about to get an enthusiastic five-star rating, especially with the social overlap about some kind of uprising of those less fortunate than us being very topical, but unfortunately, it derails by the end. The closing mythological explanation either shouldn’t have been there (so that the doubles worked on a purely allegorical level), or it should have been more bulletproof, because the way it’s presented makes you poke into several practical details of the working of the world of the doubles, which is a road to hell. And the very last twist is even more confusing. Immediately after the screening, I’m not sure whether it didn’t unintendedly make the film lose its meaning. At the same time, I’m looking forward to watching it again in the future and, already knowing the twists, see if it makes sense or not. In any case, Us does provide plenty of material for an “autopsy” and I’m sure it’ll remain in my head for awhile, which is appreciated. (26/03/2019)

I'm almost beginning to think that Jordan Peele chooses the actors for the lead roles for their eyes, but it's also for their acting mastery. Lupita Nyong'o was perfect for the lead role, both for her better version and the darker one, which is truly terrifying. Jordan Peele then shows that he can also build scenes brilliantly to make them scary simply through their visuals. He is truly a horror talent. (21/06/2019)