Alien

Ridley Scott's first major "notch" in world cinema. A film shot in an utterly timeless way with lots of creepy sounds and visual "experiences". Sometimes I wonder how much better the final impression could have been if I could have sat in the cinema (preferably alone) in that year 1979 or 1980 and enjoyed the horror in its full glory on the screen. But back then I was just a twinkle in my mother’s eye...))) One of Mr. Scott's best pieces. 100% (30/09/2009)

If someone were to define the qualities a truly significant and excellent film should have, it wouldn’t take them long to get to the concept of timelessness. And since we have been in the XXI century for some time already and timelessness is determined only retrospectively, I would put Alien as the benchmark for timelessness in the movie industry, because, save for certain aspects of the technology of the ship, this film has not aged a day. What is striking, however, is that even after all this time and all the similarly thematic stuff created during it, this film never ceases to seduce the attention of the viewer in an almost exhibitionist manner, holding them under constant tension, even though they already know all the twists. This is undoubtedly the result of the amazing work not only by make-up artists, set designers, the technical staff and Jerry Goldsmith, but especially Ridley Scott, who possibly never again in his career would make something with such confidence, and his timing for editing and sense for building tension outside the frame that make every scene with the famous terrors material for a wholesome horror story. Every aspect of that necessarily cut-off world and environment has been though-out to the tiniest detail and the initial curiosity (who’s sending the signal? Who does the spaceship belong to? What is that creature on Kane’s face doing and why is it keeping him alive?) is gradually overcome by fear and concern for the characters, while always providing an explanation that makes sense. In addition, the claustrophobic setting and the reliance on sound work flawlessly throughout, making Alien a unique and very artistic spin on the space-slasher that paved the way for a host of followers, but with a creative dominance that has made it impossible for them to approach it qualitatively – the only thematically similar contribution that gets close (and which in fact I prefer) is The Thing. James Cameron in the direct sequel understood that he had to take a different, more explicit path, and he did it wonderfully. In any case, the privileged status of this film is unquestionable and… timeless. (05/03/2020)

Ridley Scott cannot be denied his directorial skill and sense for a unique creepy atmosphere, but after so many years, it doesn't have quite the same level of horror as it did ten or twenty years ago. The original screenplay, the great cast, and the excellent direction, along with the depressive music and fantastic devilish atmosphere, are all positives, But I still give preference to the militant Cameron. (01/11/2003)

The most famous representative of its genre, its thematically related followers can’t even hold a candle to it. My big sister told me that during a screening in our cinema (during the totalitarian era – what a wonder!), a female spectator didn't manage to leave the hall and threw up during one tense scene. Nowadays, Alien probably wouldn't shock anyone, but back then it was something completely new, unseen. I have two people in particular to thank for that: Ridley Scott, who was in fine form, and H.R. Giger, without whose vision, the result would probably not have been so rewarding. (02/03/2003)

When a movie manages to frighten you to death even thirty years after its release, you must admit it’s good. And all you need to do is to show nothing, keep everything hidden and flash lights in the viewers’ faces and they will be terrified. If it weren’t for James Cameron, Ridley Scott would be the uncrowned king of the Alien saga. (25/11/2007)