Mission: Impossible II

John Woo knows how to make a scene impactful, but somehow he has forgotten how to make the whole film interesting. Some scenes are surprisingly drawn-out and tiring, which also affects the jokes that lack the right punch. Tom Cruise is suited for this role, but the face swapping was overly exaggerated in this case. The film is too long to truly entertain throughout its entirety. (06/05/2014)

Ethan Hunt's fundamental problem is the fact that he is unable to find his identity. Neither his personal, nor the genre identity. Whilst De Palma took the path of an action spy film, John Woo walked down a path ever so familiar to him: the path of an action movie. But the script is so broken, so covered with stones and rubble, that roughly the first half of the film is a complete mess. The level of dialogues is at the level of an unintentional absurd drama, the plot is horribly schematic, and there is no tension. Where in the first film the viewer struggled a little with the plot, Woo offers a dismal compilation of slow-motion and pseudo-spy scenes filmed with a lack of interest, which will not convince even a five-year-old child of their credibility. The expected break into the action finale does not bring relief. Again, one cannot identify with Hunt in any way - the character contains nothing interesting at all except a million-dollar face and nice clothes. The love storyline is annoying and naive, so there is no compassion for melodramatic tones. The truth is that as soon as the pigeons appear on the scene, Woo finds himself on his favorite steamer again and cuts out a pretty nice action sequence, which, as a result, sounds like an absolute cry into the dark. This did not work for everyone involved (except perhaps Hans Zimmer). (15/01/2007)

Predictable plot and a bunch of all sorts of stupid clichés (I’ve lost count of the times I’ve seen a main villain aiming at the protagonist and instead of immediately pulling the trigger, he starts talking) that I dislike so much. Moreover, the Hollywood air doesn't really suit John Woo, the action sequences are rather lame for a filmmaker of his calibre (except maybe the final chase) and I don't believe Cruise as a super agent. As a typical brainwasher, M.I.II is passable in those two hours, but it doesn't impress with anything. The 550 million box office returns worldwide is a bit of a mystery to me. (30/04/2005)

From a negative attitude to a positively tuned tolerance to a surprised admiration. The way Woo reimagined the series is unparalleled, but we can thank him for the number of spent bullets hiding in each adventure. Lots of action, style or slow-motion scenes, excessively emotional dialogues bordering on B-movie romance, and Ethan Hunt in the role of an unstoppable Mohican. Everything slightly beyond the acceptable cheesy factor - and yet this part is the one I have seen the most. (12/05/2006)

A fantastically directed action movie by the master of masters John Woo. The plot is not essential and the storyline itself is practically pulled out of thin air, with all the lapses in logic and screenplay flaws that come with it. However, the action is filmed so perfectly that one cannot help but forgive all the downsides. Woo has an unbelievable sense for visuals and colors (Seville, the scenes in the desert, the shootout in BioCyte), he doesn't miss any detail and puts an unprecedented effort into it. One example of his precise craftsmanship is the shootout in the multi-story building, which is simply breathtaking, not only because of its dynamics, but also the overall visual concept (sparks, lighting, camera). This is where Woo is truly the best, and it is the film’s main attraction. As the second and third thing that make me give it a full score, there is the brilliant atmospheric music and possibly one of the most beautiful women I have ever seen. (07/05/2005)