Prince of Darkness

Carpenter lays down some pretty solid arcs here in his unmistakable style, making Prince of Darkness into another great serving of what horror has to offer. The suffocating atmosphere created by the simple masks, the artful work with the unknown evil descending on the earth, and the brilliant horror music can be felt throughout. In addition, the more than solid script, interestingly working with the "clichés" of the Satan cult, works alongside this, which makes me almost give it the best possible review. However, in the end, it's still standard Carpenter, with no proper innovation in the formal procedures, and the sense he occasionally steals from his past works is very evident to more knowledgeable viewers, and some things can be predicted ahead of time (such as the kill list). Despite this, the most important thing (the viewer's emotions) remains, and so I give it four stars with a clear conscience. (31/07/2006)

Prince of Darkness is essentially John Carpenter's Lovecraftian variation on his second film, Assault on Precinct 13. This time the characters are besieged by an ambient threat in a church instead of a police station. And while Assault was a modern version of Howard Hawks's western Rio Bravo, Prince of Darkness pays homage not only to Lovecraft but also to screenwriter Nigel Kneale, particularly his film Quatermass and the Pit. In both films, scientists discover an alien object underground that has a psychic effect on humans. Here, a group of scientists investigate an ancient canister containing a liquid alien life form discovered in the basement of a church. The film combines elements of science fiction and horror with religious themes and theories of quantum physics (which Carpenter was fascinated with at the time) in a novel way, blurring the lines between science and spirituality. One of the main characters declares: "while order DOES exist in the universe, it is not at all what we had in mind!" Good and evil are linked here with the concept of matter and antimatter, and Satan is described by the local science team as an "antigod", a cosmic force of extraterrestrial origin, a rather unusual idea. The whole film is a masterclass in building atmosphere and anticipation of impending doom, but unfortunately fails to hold the viewer's attention throughout. It tries to scare us largely intellectually and create a sense of existential dread, but after a while it gets a little boring with lengthy monotonous scenes in which a group of bland characters just stare at computer monitors and brood over what's going on. Every time something dramatic happens, the film manages to dazzle with cheesy but imaginative effects that defy the laws of Newtonian physics, but then reverts back to dry dialogue. For me, the weakest part of Carpenter's apocalyptic trilogy, but a must for fans of the director. (08/12/2023)

For me, the fourth best Carpenter (after The Thing, Halloween and In The Mouth of Madness). The story moves along quite slowly, using the mysterious rooms of an old monastery to build a terrifying atmosphere, which becomes thicker than mud, and by the end (i.e. the last 25 minutes) had me watching almost without blinking. Everything is supported by an excellent horror soundtrack, which doesn’t have a motif as strong as Halloween’s, but it’s nonetheless superb and elevates the experience. If there’s anything really worth criticising, that’s the very (and I mean very) unlikeable characters, whose actions and words sometimes get dangerously close to idiocy. Otherwise, satisfaction. (12/08/2008)

The magic and appeal of Prince of Darkness are derived entirely from its creative and musical aspects. Though the visual effects are cheap and even ridiculous in places, there aren’t enough of them to do the film any harm. Conversely, there’s an abundantly dark and sultry atmosphere created by the almost constant darkness, great dream imagery and demonic music. Like The Thing, this is a horror movie with an extremely pessimistic ending that will give you chills and you won’t exactly want to pop open a bottle of champagne. (04/06/2002)

In the early 90s, some films that had already premiered in the West in the 80s or 70s arrived in Europe for the first time. Among them were several horror titles, such as Prince of Darkness. I was truly fascinated by the jump scares and special effects at the time, which now look laughable, and so, originally, influenced by nostalgia, I gave it a higher rating. John Carpenter has the reputation of a great horror creator, but he has always been unequivocally a B-movie director who made commercial films, and only on a few rare occasions has he managed to surpass his own shadow. In fact, there are only two titles that I truly approve of, the legendary The Thing and In the Mouth of Madness, which beautifully - perhaps best of all the films on a similar topic - captures the sympathetic trashiness of Lovecraft's literary work. Prince of Darkness does not belong to those exceptions, the ravages of time have taken their toll on it, and above all, today I see the ridiculous dialogues and silly behavior of the characters. The screenplay is simply stupid. However, even after all these years, I can still give the soundtrack a perfect rating, as it is a real treat within the genre, and the camera work and visual design of the scenes are remarkable. For that, John gets 2 stars and contributes 45% to the overall impression. Unfortunately, this film also fully exposes the fact that Carpenter, limited by the budget, mostly - actually almost always - worked with B-actors, meaning second and nth-category actors... (05/01/2013)