Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle

If someone in the cinema had got the celluloid reels mixed up, you wouldn't even notice it. If this movie is a commercial success, that will mean the beginning of the end of good American film entertainment – nothing more than a big budget is needed to make something like this. I’m glad that I will die with the current generation and not be a witness to the time when 90% of Hollywood productions are guided by this equation. (20/06/2003)

Yeah, it’s awful bollocks. But can I honestly be mad at a film that openly admits its awfulness in every scene, doesn't take itself seriously at all, and is filmed at a killer pace that doesn't let you get bored? Sometimes, with a certain amount of detachment, you can actually enjoy this kind of bullshit. Which is not to say that I seek out this type of entertainment. (29/10/2005)

Bigger, rougher, and more action-packed may not always be harmful and ruin the impression of the first part. With the angels, there is nothing to ruin because I avoid the first one by several kilometers. The stupid bantering is surprisingly bearable this time, and the action is not only watchable but even great. Moreover, the central trio gained a lot of sex appeal with a shovel. (07/08/2006)

I enjoyed these Angels perhaps even more than the first one, it's just a pity Bill Murray didn't attend, though he probably knew why. In other words, it's bullshit, but beautiful. And there’s John Cleese. And Demi Moore. Yeah, and Lucy, Drew, and Cameron...there's a lot there:-))) (04/06/2009)