HappyThankYouMorePlease

Despite the relational study of life in New York, I did not strive to compare myself to Woody Allen, but when one dialogue "anonymously" reminded me of him, I realized that Josh Radnor wants just that. To place his narrative at least partially alongside the great one. And why not in the end? I believe in relationships, their punchlines too, and even actors are tamed exactly so that no one stands out and their smaller mosaic is adequate. There's nothing to discuss, the ideal indie contemplation is here. (30/05/2011)

As an appetizer for a Woody Allen film, this relationship comedy does not disappoint. Conscious of its actors’ abilities and the options provided by the budget, it doesn’t delve into grand existential issues, but it still could have achieved a better result in its lightweight category. In the introduction, we are unwisely left for a longer time in the company of the likable Sam, who, however, will not be the only important character. I simply didn’t have any desire to run from her to the two couples at non-rhythmic intervals. This slows the film down and makes it difficult to get to know any of the characters better. Sam’s story would have easily sufficed as a stand-alone narrative. Perhaps Radnor should have just kept the focus on her. 65% (29/04/2012)