VOD (1)

Plots(1)

Based on the bestselling novel by Joyce Carol OatesBlonde boldly reimagines the life of one of Hollywood’s most enduring icons, Marilyn Monroe. From her volatile childhood as Norma Jeane, through her rise to stardom and romantic entanglements, Blonde blurs the lines of fact and fiction to explore the widening split between her public and private selves. (Venice International Film Festival)

(more)

Videos (2)

Trailer 1

Reviews (8)

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English Andrew Dominik recreates the heavy atmosphere surrounding Norma Jean’s horrific life right from the very first scene, with Hollywoodland in flames. His work with the picture, alternating cameras, colors and lighting and even picture size surprisingly enhances the storytelling, rather than being a distraction. Ana de Armas’ performance is fantastic, styled as housewife on the brink of madness, slash promiscuous movie star. The way the story is broken up into separate scenes is sometimes confusing, but necessary, otherwise the movie would have to last four hours. The dream and drug sequences at the end are a delight. The premiere of Some Like It Hot ("I Love Love Love You All") with the monster photographers is the high point of the whole movie. It is certainly more watchable than Mank, but Blonde just isn’t a movie for everybody. If you let it, it’ll swallow you whole. P.S.: The White House scene is far from a disappointment! ()

NinadeL 

all reviews of this user

English Rewriting a fictional biography is a problematic category in and of itself. I dismissed Joyce Carol Oates' book years ago considering all the fabrications therein, but the filmmakers found it interesting to take this material and base an experimental look at the life of the eternally unhappy Marilyn Monroe on it. People who don't know the era and the old movies won't appreciate anything about it. MM fans and connoisseurs continue to prefer any other biopic (including the problematic My Week with Marilyn), while others may not care about this Netflix event. Blonde is just another pointless affair. It is instead important to point out that a film about or with MM has been in the works since her untimely death and thus is nothing new under the sun. ()

Ads

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English It's the kind of film that, as someone who writes about movies for a living, I should be blown away by. And I really appreciate the formal intentions that twist the story of the shining icon of the silver screen into a non-linear, audiovisually precarious mosaic of the hardscrabble life of a woman exploited by everyone and desperately seeking male support. But Blonde didn't touch me once in its 166 minutes, and, apart from a reminder of the 1950s feel, cut with disorienting halos, its style didn't impress me at all. It's nice that it comes across as the opposite of theatrical, that Armas gives a fantastic performance and Dominik directs his dream defiance of clean and respectful iconography, but what's the point when all I get out of it is a long moment? I was expecting this film to give me a lot of ideas, especially on the formal, stylistic and narrative level, but it just doesn't interest me... 65 % ()

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English A TV tear-jerker. Blonde is a mosaic of the “experiences” of a tormented girl searching for her own identity and place in the world. It is engaging with its atmosphere, but needlessly long given how little information it provides. The constant illogical alternation of picture formats and switching between color and black-and-white scenes correspond to the protagonist’s confused mental state. It’s a simple yet original technique that works quite well. Ana de Armas is excellent, giving a committed and heartfelt performance. It’s a shame that her efforts are wasted on a film that can’t be appreciated by a broader audience. Andrew Dominik has something going for him as an artist, but he is NOT Terrence Malick. ()

Goldbeater 

all reviews of this user

English Almost three hours of "misery porn" with a made-for-TV quality that kills with its mood and visual monotony after the first 45 minutes. Ana de Armas gives a committed and engaging performance, but I would have liked to have seen her in a differently conceived film. A couple of scenes (especially the ones with the embryo) explicitly crossed the line into emotionally extortionate kitsch. ()

Gallery (330)