The Wolf of Wall Street

I guess I don't like movies where Leo is very rich and indulgent. The fact is that except for a few jokes in the style of The Hangover, it all seemed to me like an opulent cocaine carnival, hiding quite a relevant (and fortunately very subdued) parable about the pernicious appeal of selling pens and a glaring paradox of sweaty balls in the subway, circumscribed elegantly in the last minutes. I appreciate that Scorsese accepts the player's perspective (and not the critique of the system) and does not push the viewer to disgust - Belfort is, of course, a repulsively attractive mediator of the world of speculation. However, the metaphors of the brokerage community as a prehistoric tribe / sect are unnecessarily obvious (although the extravaganza is nice to look at). Also remarkable is the obvious "immorality" of the film, which actually calmly claims that a similar lifestyle is cool in a way - and Scorsese is, of course, right. If he wasn't, the Wolf would have nothing to eat. The best thing about the film in this regard is about 5 minutes, which the brokerage shaman McConaughey hums to a hypnotic rhythm. I have nothing to criticize it for at its core - it plays back the worn out notes confidently and without mistakes, it just didn't speak to me at all with its frenetic cadence. It’s the similar problem of "numbness of sarcasm" that I had with Gavras' more engaged film Capital. At least The Wolf of Wall Street brazenly says, with a smirk, what we all know about the speculative nature of capitalism, admittedly unreliably and without unnecessary rhetorical phrases. And it doesn't burden you with unnecessarily complicated details at all. Why would it, when another reduction is waiting around the corner? But the film still takes 3 hours, in which I did not find enough stimuli. Of course, except for the cocaine, prostitutes, and those damn deceleration pills... (11/01/2014)

What surprised me, and not in a very good way, is that Scorece’s position towards the protagonist is neutral, as if he was saying that ripping people off, doing drugs and shagging whores is kind of fine. That's a pretty big problem for me, as a die-hard idealist. So far, none of Scorsese's films have lacked some kind of catharsis at the end, unfortunately I didn't get it here. I acknowledge the fantastic filmmaking, which on more than one occasion managed to elicit a relieved laugh from me, but otherwise I'd always prefer the stupid postmen who can only afford penny stocks over cunts like Jordan Belfort and his wolf pack. This farce is actually very far from a complex fresco telling something about something. (16/01/2014)

The most fundamental American film since The Social Network. The film is not amoral, what’s amoral is its protagonist and modern society as a whole. He’s an asshole who ended up in prison (for a ridiculously short time), without friends and in debt due to his criminal behaviour and yet he has a relatively normal life, and there are still business people who take him as a role model and eagerly listen to his motivational lectures. Though Scorsese doesn’t portray the main character from an acceptable moral position (after all, Belfort himself is the narrator), after three hours of footage, a sensible viewer can make their own judgement, and thanks to this confrontation, a lively comedy becomes a very caustic satire. Excellent and brisk fun with pretty dark reverberations. Get over it. (16/01/2014)

The Wolf of Wall Street has rightfully become one of the most important events of the season. It accurately captures the atmosphere of a time marked by an economic crisis and surprises with the realization that not everyone tightens their belts equally during times of need and that human justice falls short when it comes to certain assholes, whose rhinoceros hides are evidently impenetrable. If nothing else, we will take revenge on them on the silver screen. The Wolf of Wall Street is reminiscent of a wild party, from which, aside from the exhilarating feeling of tasting forbidden fruit and crossing the boundaries of socially acceptable behavior, you will likely remember only a few shocking escapades and excesses after a few days. The film depicts a series of parties, revelry, drug trips, and an insatiable desire for wealth in a somewhat stereotypical and thus tiresome manner. It tells the story of a group of brokers who do not hesitate to destroy the lives of naive clients with offers of worthless stocks from obscure companies. The film is reminiscent of Lord of War and Trainspotting with its absence of moral dimension and final catharsis. In all three cases, we are dealing with scoundrels who ultimately succeed and get away with it, despite minor setbacks and losses. Scorsese proves that old age does not necessarily mean a loss of connection with modern cinema. Quite the opposite, as the same can be said for him as for vintage wines - the older, the better. He rivals Fincher in camera skills, enjoys crowd scenes, and effortlessly handles action sequences, such as sinking a yacht in a stormy sea. He varies the rhythm and slows down the shots, and a single detail can reveal more about his characters than any other director could describe in an entire film. A separate chapter is dedicated to DiCaprio's performance in the lead role. Villains are always more rewarding for actors. DiCaprio revels in the role of a cynical, unscrupulous businessman, delightfully showcasing his boundless hedonism, narcissism, and manipulativeness. It is said that when actors enjoy filming, the audience cries over their paychecks, and vice versa. This is clearly not the case here. Both DiCaprio and Jonah Hill clearly enjoyed the overdose scene, which is brilliantly comical and will likely become a revered classic among film fans. DiCaprio promises, seduces, bribes, and threatens, and above all, presents a study of a man obsessed with himself and navigating an endless drug trip. Despite the aforementioned, I have to give it the highest rating. The Wolf of Wall Street is like a hyperactive, self-centered child that persistently demands attention. Its coolness eventually becomes tiresome. Paradoxically, I realized that I would have enjoyed the film more with a shorter runtime and fewer gags. Overall impression: 85%. (22/01/2014)

Fear and loathing in New York. Good old Scorsese remains true to himself, yet he’s rejuvenated through over-the-top decadent stylization, speech and, indeed, the content of individual scenes. It begins as a cynically satirical and amoral demystification of the American capitalist dream, not unlike There Will Be Blood. It continues as a pure junkie comedy on par with Trainspotting. And it ends with a variation on Catch Me If You Can. And as incompatible as these individual threads may seem, Scorsese's (and, in no small part, DiCaprio's) greatest achievement is that it all feels like one cohesive whole. This is also due to the fact that there isn’t a moment to exhale for three hours; at least for the duration of projection. After that, you have to be honest that even though there isn't a single boring or bad scene in it, some could stand being edited out. It also depends on whether you think that Scorsese is glorifying Belfort or that he is satirically doing the exact opposite. But damn it, it's such outrageous fun, with something for everyone; from freakin’ self reflection through its frickin’ cinephilic form to fuckin’ gut-busting scenes. (27/12/2013)