Elysium

Blomkamp, Kosinski, Snyder, etc. are all cut from the same cloth. Visually, they are very original, with an incredible sense of innovation and aesthetic creativity, usually producing simpler, even skeletal films. It's not always necessarily bad, but Elysium was in many ways very clichéd and unnecessarily simplistic. Of course, there is a political subtext with references to this or that regime, and a twisted rhetoric of "the poor, dirty and smelly" being the good guys and the "rich, successful, and thriving" being the bad guys. No matter how you look at it, we have a predictable plot with a clear script, several thrilling action scenes, and unbelievably polished and over-the-top shots that you'll want to see again and again. It's an unprecedented mix of futuristic sci-fi with brutally raw action and blurry imagery, that continues the trademark of District 9, just with a slightly bigger budget, so everything is smoother and more refined. Finally, we can't forget the show-off objects like the Versace lounge chair or the private Bugatti jet. The director is a big fan of image, and unfortunately, this film is purely "image-driven". Nevertheless, it is incredibly captivating filmmaking. (02/09/2013)

Neill Blomkamp is certainly one of the most prominent characters in world cinema. Above all, he’s definitely an idol for sci-fi maniacs, because what he did with aliens in the middle of Joburg this time shook me in several ways, and I haven’t really come around from that to this day. I got really happy when I learned that Neill was making another sci-fi movie, this time with Hollywood actors, which promised a bigger budget and possibly a more epic story. In the end, I was hoping that all those Hollywood weirdoes and big-wigs wouldn’t make it into a political agitation, dictating what Neill could and couldn’t do in a good old American blockbuster. In the end, I was pleasantly surprised. It wasn’t bad but it wasn’t quite perfect either, just like District 9. Maybe because it was pretty similar. The worst thing for me was the camerawork. I didn’t mind it as much in District 9 – it was a low budget movie with a unique idea, done in a distinctive half-documentary style, at least in the first half. But Elysium is a blockbuster, and in that case I expect that all these space-ships, monsters and modern machines will be well-visible. And not that I would look at it all as if I were sitting in a carriage pulled by a horse through some bumpy path somewhere in the mountains. That was quite a problem for me. However, the director of photography Trent Opaloch collaborates with Neil on a long-term basis, so I don’t expect Neil’s films to change much in the foreseeable future. On the positive side, we get to see Sharlto Copley, who delivers an almost demonic performance. (18/12/2013)

Once I got through District 9, I had hoped it was just an unfortunate accident. However, Elysium confirmed to me that I don't understand Neill Blomkamp and it would be best if we went our separate ways. Never mind that this skeleton of an unstoppable machine suits Matt Damon perfectly with its camera shaking and flying around in the action scenes, while the story stumbles into plotholes despite its simple premise. Not to mention that practically all of the supporting characters are played strangely, to say the least. Jodie Foster, who doesn't fit her role, is an unpleasant surprise, William Fichtner disappoints in a way that is merely dull, but Sharlto Copley is actually annoying. His unintelligible hissing and desperately overplayed slickness are truly maddening. But I could forgive all of that if the screenplay had met me halfway and tried to play a different note in the finale than a humane and nostalgically romantic one. The social appeal was already starting to annoy me in the middle of District 9, so that was just predictable, while the sentimental storyline annoyed me because Max's relationship with Frey is nothing more than a distant memory that would never stand a chance in this vision of the future. And when emotions, characters, and actions don't work on the path to freedom, it makes for a rather sad ending. Elysium ultimately ends up being a giant nothing that tries so hard to aim high, but from the beginning, has no way up. (28/08/2013)

The shaky (like really!) camera and crazy (like really!) editing hand in hand kills all action in this movie; and the stupidly and superficially forced social conscience would also have killed the action... If there were any. Simply awful. And if that wasn’t enough, it seems that half of the movie is missing. And of course it’s the half where Neill “I like to make ‘too many cooks’-style movies" Blomkamp devoted to the story, characters, elementary inner logic and the links between the (unlinked) scenes. (28/08/2013)

A story comparable with the picture book about the hippo that Damon quotes from in the movie, but the way they did it! A flawless rendition of the future that meets my demands. Perfect atmosphere and awesome action which sometimes stops short of the proverbial icing on the cake (which is a shame). The exosuit fight at the end is one of the best action sci-fi (hand-to-hand) fights I’ve ever seen. Blomkamp has gone a bit soft since last time and even though most of the characters behave like swines, they don’t mean it badly, which is a drawback compared to D9. The main powerhouse of the picture is the fantastic Sharlto Copley as Kruger, a fanatical psychopath (and my favorite character) whose alternative would probably have made for the best ending. Max, where are you?! (06/09/2013)