Directed by:
Ridley ScottCinematography:
Dariusz WolskiComposer:
Marc StreitenfeldCast:
Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Charlize Theron, Idris Elba, Guy Pearce, Logan Marshall-Green, Sean Harris, Rafe Spall, Emun Elliott, Benedict Wong (more)VOD (4)
Plots(1)
Returning to the genre he helped define, Sir Ridley Scott has crafted the most unforgettable experience of 2012 in Prometheus. After scientists Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green) discover mysterious cave drawings that point to the origins of mankind, they soon find themselves aboard the spaceship Prometheus, sponsored by Weyland Industries and on a journey to uncover the secrets of humanity. Overseen by the imperious Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron), looked after by the android David (Michael Fassbender), and backed up by a team of scientists Shaw and Holloway arrive on the isolated moon LV-223 to discover an abandoned alien spaceship and the truth... that not all is as it seems. (20th Century Fox Home Entertainment)
(more)Reviews (13)
Pretend you’re going to watch Alien vs. Predator 3 without the Predators and you’ll be ecstatic. The first third is an absolute sci-fi orgasm – exciting, epic, atmospherically captivating, visually engaging, with attractive actors and a promise of great things to come. Everything here is so perfect down to every tiny detail that one wants to cry with happiness. Plus there are some nice ideas conveyed through the dialogue (and monologues). The second third slows the pace down and brings a more intimate tone when it tries to tell us more about the characters. The last third is hastily put together action horror with butchered editing and storytelling, which doesn’t elaborate on the originally outlined themes, and is ridden with genre clichés and Emmerichian heroism. Luckily, the closing scene setting up a sequel somewhat mitigates the disappointment. Fantastically shot piece of screenwriting crap. I feel cheated, Ridley.
()
Prometheus has landed! The critics have spoken at length about the illogical behaviour of the characters and the unresolved jumps in the plot, so I will write something in its defence. Yes, those complaints are undoubtedly warranted and that’s a real shame, without those issues this film would be almost perfect, because everything except the script is very good. However, part of those flaws in logic could be excused saying that instead of a “team of methodological, 100% reliable and careful scientist” the expedition features “scientists driven by an inner desire for answers and discoveries”; some of the unresolved motifs can be easily guessed and some of the incomprehensible behaviour and weird details aren’t actually that impossible to understand, it’s just the viewers who don’t understand them (e.g. the behaviour of David or the settings of the medical equipment). And I also think it’s good that there are things left unsaid about the mythology, because thinking about a mythology on your own is A LOT of fun (BTW, the often used combo “Scott ruined the mystery around Alien” + “Scott didn’t explain anything” is logically contradictory). What’s left, and can by no means be excused (the scientists getting lost in the mapped galleries, etc.)… well, how you see it will depend on the type of viewer you are. If you demand films should be 100% coherent, with a clear theme that is addressed properly, and where all the questions are answered and all the motifs are addressed, tough luck. If, in contrast, you like a more open text, where the interpretations of and the musings over the meanings (or, rather finding the meanings, in this case :-D) are just as important, if not more, than the film itself, then you will know how to forgive Prometheus’s mistakes. Fortunately, I’m in the second group. /// The visuals are intoxicating, the ideas about the creator-creation relationship (because we can) are interesting, and the mythology, which only peeks behind the curtains, is even more interesting. 8.5/10 and relative satisfaction (!!!), though it certainly had more potential. PS: I want an extended version on DVD and in two years I want a sequel not written by Damon Lindelof :-D PPS: From a certain perspective, this film, together with its advertising campaign, is a brilliant package because it gives the viewers an experience very similar to the protagonist. Elizabeth joins the expedition to find answers to important philosophical questions. Her motivations are not mundane, she expects something like enlightenment (figure out who we are, why we came to be and what is our purpose). The campaign and the film’s first act prepare the viewer for sophisticated and uncompromising science fiction – a genre milestone. Elizabeth gets to the planet and, instead of finding satisfactory answers, she and the entire crew have “their asses kicked” by angry extraterrestrials. The viewer goes to the cinema and, instead of the intellectual sci-fi that was promised, they get brutal horror with notes of B-movie. It’s hard to jump in joy at this, but as a joke it’s good :-D
()
(less)
(more)
Spoiler impressionology! It's been exactly ten years, give or take a few days, since I saw the first Alien, the film that piqued my interest in cinema as a whole, and the question of what came before has actually been gnawing at me for a decade. So from a purely subjective point of view, I have no reservations about it because the film answered my questions. First of all, it confirmed that the aliens are a biological weapon that probably cannot be controlled by anyone. So far, so good. But when I look at it with hindsight, aided by a brief post-film debate, I don't quite understand why the writers had to break the film into survival horror in the second half, endowing the characters with the logic of incompetent teenagers. Visually, including Streitenfeld's excellent audio, there's nothing to fault it for (well, except for Weyland's mask, that's horrible) but there's not a single climactic scene, something that would draw me to the movie theater for a second screening. This is actually a huge shame because, for the first hour, Scott was creating a more interesting world than James Cameron has recently. After leaving the theatre I was ready to give it four stars, given that the marketing campaign had gone beyond me, but I thought about the film a bit too much during the twenty-minute journey home.
()
Prometheus is a pretty decent sci-fi, but at times it has almost fatal sci-fi related flaws. It begins at an amazing pace. The story is timeless, imaginative and it has a great pace due to the strange atmosphere. The second half is much weaker, everything begins to be a routine and the worst of all is, spoiler alert, the alien finale. That really pissed me off. Prometheus was supposed to be pure sci-fi with everything it entails and not the prequel to Ridley Scott’s Alien. The whole time it made a completely different impression and in the finale he turns it into this and thinks I will fall on my butt… I feel really sorry for that. Visually, it is absolutely amazing, and that also counts for something.
()
Alien was a film based on one simple premise (horror from the unknown), and the way Scott managed to play on a single emotion in a masterful form - paradoxically, the simplicity of the film ensured that the experience from it does not age for even a second - the horror and panic are captured in clear and virtuoso form. Prometheus is based on roughly three premises (the relationship of the creator - creation / faith / fear of the unknown), but none of them can even make it to the embryonic state. To put it bluntly: the script is awful. Half of the characters act as if they have just undergone a lobotomy, the metaphysical overlaps are resolved by repeating the word "faith", and the most human and best-written character is an android. The jump scares are cheap, as well as genre props (olms and a crab man, WTF?), there is a complete lack of the finesse with which the terror in Alien was composed from the a dense soundtrack and a masterfully composed image (some of the action scenes are pure routine)... On the other hand, I appreciate that even though Ridley is already noticeably running out of breath and ideas, Prometheus still has a magnificent artistic solution and your head spins from the giant scenes. In the end, I wondered if this film was needed in terms of the "aliens" of the series - the answer "about as much as everything after Aliens". So the answer is very little, or not at all. He answers the few questions with the help of cliché, and he doesn't open any new ones (even if he really wants to). The deep disappointment can be explained by the fact that the expectations were set elsewhere by the fault of the creators, i.e., something other than an "action horror B-movie with an A-movie design and a philosopher from McDonald’s". I will be mourning until July... [50%]
()
When white and white together give birth to black, the result is Alien without an Alien, like Jára Cimrman’s “Hamlet" without Hamlet. It’s not compatible with the Alien mythology but it overflows with today already cult and specific “Alien" atmosphere more than anything else made after 1979, you have to give it that. Just a shame that it pretends to be cleverer than it really is (even though it’s hard to say, because it’s just the first half) and double shame for the surplus of unnecessary characters. Visually captivating in some of the scenes it’s without exaggeration impeccable (David’s space routine, birth giving through abortion, fall from the heavens), but as a whole so far (at least till the director’s cut or a sequel is made) it just damn good.
()
No one promised a prequel to Alien or a Space Odyssey. The trailers promised me stunning visuals, a generous dose of tension, and an unreadable enemy. The movie delivered on all of that and added an unpredictable David, determined Elizabeth, and a breathtaking story where the answers to questions must be sought, not just heard. Prometheus thus became a surprisingly delicate sci-fi, which will continue to mature for a good few years.
()
I'll be polite, and I'll only say yuck! Prometheus, whether it's the work of the director who started the Alien saga, a very clever online advertising campaign with well-timed videos and interviews, or speculation about its accessibility, promised a lot and managed to get genre fans hyped up to the highest level of expectation. The initial reactions were lukewarm, but I attributed that to unrealistic inflated expectations. So, what can I say about what I saw? It's really hard to describe because you really need to see this film to understand. I honestly can't attribute my disappointment to high expectations, as I was prepared for an imperfect film. However, if you want to enjoy this film, forget about any associations with the original Alien. It is, in fact, a spiritual sibling to Aliens and Predator - with an unbelievably, and I mean unbelievably, stupid script, terrifyingly dumb dialogue, and completely illogical behavior from practically everyone involved. The film is saved by the great visuals - the level of special effects has of course improved fantastically since the late 70s, and Scott had a more than decent budget, which is evident in Prometheus. Because there are very few high-budget sci-fi films made, Prometheus doesn't have much competition. It's a shame that the director settled for such a mess and didn't even try to achieve some sort of compromise because this really isn't a compromise, it's an absolute resignation to the original essence and atmosphere of Alien. You'll find everything here from aliens to mutants to alien babies, grand spaceships, action, and dying, but the result is pathetic. This is a summer blockbuster that doesn't expect any brain activity from its viewers. Noomi Rapace won't become the new Ripley, not so much because she lacks acting potential, but rather due to the incompetence of the character, thanks to the lobotomy performed by the screenwriting team. The previous four Alien films were different in every respect, but each was unique and despite the fluctuations in quality and certain logical lapses, none of them disappointed me. Prometheus is a disaster, mainly due to its terrifying inconsistency, with dozens of motifs that the screenwriters slapped together strangely. Overall impression: 25% for the stunning visuals and quality marketing. I have some things to add a week later in response to the ongoing Prometheus discussion and numerous comments... I have to admit that when I visit the movie theater in the summer months, I always come a little late, to skip the advertising bombardment of the blockbusters that are being mass-promoted at that time. They are so stupid that even the trailers make me feel depressed. Before watching Prometheus, I was forced to watch the American president jumping around like a monkey and killing bloodthirsty vampires left and right. Immediately after, a mutated piranha tried to attack me from the sink drain, and I eagerly awaited something that made sense. Ridley Scott never made great art, and his early films, like Alien or Blade Runner, didn't have the same intention as Tarkovsky's Stalker or Solaris. However, he had one huge merit - he showed that genre films (specifically sci-fi, but you can project it onto any genre) can be entertaining and at the same time smart, and can appeal to the widest masses of audiences. Scott started from scratch, but he turned it into a masterpiece. Several decades later, he humbly returned to that scratch, because he made a really stupid film. When I look at the Alien saga in retrospect, the best film is definitely the second one, although Cameron's militaristic drama is not as close to my spirit as the atmospheric first one. Aliens has a quality script, attractive characters, a dynamic plot, and capable actors. Compare the last soldier designated for extermination in the first action scene with the losers presented to us by Prometheus as crew members. In the first case, even the minor characters have developed personalities, while in the second case, you hardly learn anything about the main characters. Right after Aliens, I rank Scott's original film Alien, which has been slightly affected by time in terms of the special effects and the development of the genre, but thanks to its visuals, cast, and atmosphere, it is still deservedly a legendary work. Alien 3 was marked by a lack of funds, which resulted in less grandeur and the choice of a script set in an unattractive prison environment, but let's admit it openly, the fans' disapproval was also caused by moves that led to the loss of beloved characters from the previous installment and the death of the main heroine. Otherwise, it is still a clever and very well-directed film, which is a gem in its genre. The fourth one, which was so far the weakest, was marked by the choice of a director who aimed at something else from the very beginning and made a film that ironizes and turns the Alien mythology upside down. It's like letting Michael Bay direct "Hamlet," John Woo direct The Ballad of Narayama, or Tarkovsky direct A Nightmare on Elm Street. However, if you were willing to join the director's game, it was still an above-average film that, in addition to the creatures, still had something in common with the original Alien, but had a different tone. In Prometheus, not only does the second half fail, but it's also stupid with its mythology, dialogue, literalness, lack of imagination, casting (except for Fassbender and partially Noomi) - basically, everything except for the visuals and music. The subsequent discussion, which tries to find meanings that the film simply doesn't have, is a reaction to the fact that the images don't make sense due to the stupid script. Prometheus is the ultimate example of big-budget trash with well-crafted visuals. It surpasses many B-movie productions in its cleverness. As can be seen, there are quite a few viewers for whom the cleverness of the film is not a significant element in their evaluation. After all, with a silly film, you can easily stroke your ego. Scott, as a co-producer, had disproportionately greater creative freedom than his predecessors and committed a cinematic crime. A-grade sci-fi is nowadays like Cinderella - it requires a large budget but usually cannot appeal to the so-called family audience and those who prevail among viewers, i.e., teenagers. It is no coincidence that dozens of comic book adaptations with superhero characters are being made, while dozens and hundreds of significant literary works in the sci-fi genre remain on the sidelines. They require a more educated audience and are commercially less appealing. Only twice have directors had the chance to make a sci-fi film without compromises, and in both cases, they messed it up. Besides Prometheus, it was both sequels to The Matrix...
()
(less)
(more)
I think that there’s about an hour of film missing. An hour to work on the relationships, to say where they found out certain things or else somehow to show that these are just assumptions, to take their time a bit and not to hurry on ahead at breakneck speed. In some places I prayed to be have the time to rummage about in the environments presented. I have no gripes about the story, looking for an answer to the question that has no answer (that guy died immediately in the first scene) is just a catalyst for investigating possibilities and space. An attempt to go further. Visually, it’s top-notch, Ridley made sure of that. Similarly, he took great pains over the casting, each actor fits their role perfectly. Noomi is really fine, but Michael Fassbender easily dominates the picture. It’s a shame too that Guy Pearce made such a brief appearance. The ending was rather surprising the way it broke down into a regular massacre. I have the feeling that Alien DNA harms this movie, the same as the hype and trailers revealing too much. I look forward to the director’s cut.
()
A film that will make a real mess in your head. In my opinion, there are several ways to perceive it, and it is difficult to say which one is the right one. Is Ridley Scott really beyond his peak, and did he really mean this empty script seriously? Does he need to give illogical explanations in the second part to squeeze out more money? The film has plenty of unanswered questions, also its intention? It all seems strange, just like the rating, which is very lukewarm. I have the impression that Prometheus will end up like Blade Runner over time, it is also technically timeless, equally ambiguous, perhaps more ethereal and iconic (tears in rain, doves), but it has many common elements. Yes, at first glance, the script seems rushed. Because the first hour is pure sci-fi orgy, meticulously executed down to the last detail, brilliantly acted, with a stunning main musical motif, and technically flawless. In the middle, the film turns into a survival drama, which is effective but divides the audience in two. Probably only in the director's cut, we will truly find out what Ridley means – or Blade Runner for the second time. I’m not afraid to say that over time it will become a timeless film that needs to mature. Just unlike Blade Runner, there are too few key answers and too many questions, and the bridge in the form of philosophy and figure it yourself is slightly missing. For that reason alone, a lower rating for the so far most controversial film of the last months or years within the genre.
()
I don't think there's been a Scott film where you can see how much plot is missing as there is in this film. I hope we will see a director's cut of Prometheus, which will give more space to Captain Janek in particular, and which will hopefully also somehow incorporate a younger "version" of Peter Weyland into the film, because otherwise the casting of Guy Pearce, hidden in the (admittedly perfect) latex mask of the old man about to die, may be annoying to some people. So for these two things I take one star off the absolute rating... And I'll be very happy to throw it in after the longer version. Prometheus deserves a full score. No, it's not groundbreaking, it's certainly not a new version of 2001 (to which he refers in the intro), but it's a damn honest sci-fi film that's been missing for a long time. Ridley Scott is still in tremendous form, and you just have to smile when you watch all the beautiful images because you can see how the creator has played with them. The digital effects are used in moderation, the action, which in the hands of other directors would surely be shaky and full of cuts and, if possible, stroboscopic flashes, is shot by Scott clearly and is still suspenseful, and the same can be said about the scenes of exploring the pyramid and, of course, about two delicacies - the encounter with the "snake" and the "self-surgery". These are such amazing moments that they made me want to chant Scott's name. As far as actors go, Michael Fassbender really is amazing - he plays very sovereignly, but at the same time doesn't draw all the attention onto himself. I still love Noomi Rapace (amazing performance) and I believed in Charlize Theron's cool commander. As far as the music is concerned, Marc Streitenfeld and Harry Gregson-Williams are obviously not Jerry Goldsmith, although there are two of them, but they conjure up a good atmosphere and I have no particular complaints about their soundtrack. So four and a bit. __P.S. The setting in the alien universe is seamless. I learned a lot of new and interesting things... And in the end, I didn't even mind that the plot didn't directly precede Alien.__P.P.S. I really didn't expect that there would be so many references to my favorite film Lawrence of Arabia._P.P.P.S. I'm starting to believe that the mystery with the casting of Guy Pearce isn't just there... And that there are some Scott antics waiting for us.
()
It's true that script-wise it's quite peculiar in some ways (considering the laws of the Alien universe), but that would be about the only criticism. Ridley Scott is simply a whiz when it comes to visuals, and such impressive and juicy imagery of the spaceship and its surroundings (especially in the first half) must aesthetically work on just about everyone. As a standalone film, Prometheus is another impressive piece in Scott's filmography. Still, I can't help but feel that my impressions of possible references to the Alien saga were a bit awkward.
()
I can tell you in advance that after the trailers I had only the highest expectations of Prometheus, and they were only partially fulfilled. First of all, I would definitely praise the film's stunning visuals and production design, which keep it above average compared to others. The shooting locations were chosen perfectly. Of the actors, I would definitely single out Charlize Theron and Fassbender, although I think his role in particular could have benefited a lot more with a better script. And that is actually the film’s biggest problem, the script. It can be endlessly reiterated that the film was crazily edited into the theater due to its length, but filmmakers of Ridley's calibre should be able to handle these situations. Unfortunately, that wasn’t the case with Prometheus. Although there are noticeable gaps in the story from the beginning, the plot is still coherent, but later in the film everything falls apart and all that remains is pure slush. The final reference to Alien (after all that was not related to it at all) cannot be explained as anything other than a very stupid joke.
()