Headhunters

I finally understand why Jo Nesbo is considered a master in the field of crime literature. Based on such great source material, the screenplay is well-written and the film is well-directed. However, it must be noted that neither the screenwriters nor the director made any serious mistakes. For about three-quarters of the way, I was convinced that I was watching a 100% five-star film. Typical Scandinavian madness, pitch-black humor, crazy situations, absurdity - even if I didn't know the country of origin, I would immediately guess it's from one of the Nordic countries. But then comes the last quarter, delimited by Roger's encounter with his wife, playing on strong emotions, and the previous atmosphere starts to crumble a bit. When the finale arrived, I thought to myself that the screenwriter had indeed made two logical somersaults. Although the first one was saved by the final credits, the second one - how can a man in the main character's situation believe a woman and bet everything on one card? That really doesn't make sense to me. Nevertheless, Headhunters cannot be denied its originality, pervasive tension, captivating characters, and impressive ending. Despite some minor reservations, I lean toward a 5-star rating. There aren't many films like this, where it is a joy to follow the development of the plot and not be deceived by screenwriting shortcomings. Overall impression: 90%. Although I'm not a moralist, I definitely wouldn't let a 12-year-old child watch this film. After all, it is a quite bloody mess, not commonly seen in today's cinema. (19/08/2013)

It’s been long since two dead fat people were so funny… A perfect Nordic thriller, and, against expectations, it’s not serious or depressing, but a brisk and entertaining film that knows how to make you feel tension, surprise and fun. PS: Plus points for giving a certain animal species the end it deserved (#cantavoidphobia). (11/11/2011)

Genre perversion in the Norwegian style. A heist, a drama about a guy with low self-esteem issues, exploitation, a thriller... Tyldum didn't quite handle the connection, and at times his conception is unpleasantly television-like and sterile, but some of the passages are almost divine (especially the part with shit and the tractor). Nesbo is undoubtedly a clever author – the story feels deliberately stupid only to surprise (within the genre limits) with solid twists at the end. The film could benefit from more perspective and better dialogues. The entertainment it offers is on the edge of guilty pleasure. Aksel Hennie in the main role is somewhere between Christopher Walken and Steve Buscemi... his focused and believable transformation from a complex dwarf to a man at his limit forces me to give 4* to this boundless and not-quite-managed directing weirdness. (26/10/2011)

I enjoyed this film. It's a crime thriller with a touch of drama and pitch-black comedy, and there's even a romantic element. I’m a fan of Jo Nesbo, especially the series featuring Harry Hole. Having read “Headhunters,” I’m surprised to say I liked the film more than the book. The main "hero" was extremely unlikable from the start, my sympathy grew as he was faced with more and more shit (literally). Nikolaj Coster-Waldau knows how to portray a bad guy. He has done it many times before and pulled it off again. This is the third time I’ve seen the film. I knew how the story would develop and how it would end, and I still loved every minute of it. Plus, I have to appreciate the lesson to be taken away from this film: when traveling on public transport, always sit between two obese passengers – it’s definitely worth the temporary discomfort. (20/12/2016)

Whatever you're expecting… It won’t happen. A genre chameleon about a stunted Walken which proves that Joe Nesbø works well on the film screen despite the plotholes (the age of the corpse one can forgive with half-closed eyes, let's say, but the hospital staff or the one who finds Roger - is it possible that no one would get in touch or ask them after the case was publicized?). (12/02/2012)