Gangster Squad

A routine affair, but definitely not a complete disaster. It's surprising that a lot of otherwise excellent and very inventive creators and actors are behind this very average film. I enjoyed the raw fights and the decent gunfights, the ultra-cool Penn and the likeable Brolin, though he is much better on the opposite side of the law, like in American Gangster. It's not nearly as intricate, skillfully written, and technically precise as, for example, Ridley Scott’s film, but it's worth seeing once. Purely average. (31/03/2013)

An unpleasantly loud burst bubble, drowning one of the most promising acting ensembles of the season. Here there may be enough style for two movies, but barely enough momentum for ten minutes. Will Beall's script puts clichéd lines in the mouths of its characters, which even names like Ryan Gosling or Josh Brolin struggle to deliver while maintaining any credibility. Should it be relegated to a story of antiheroes on a quest for justice? Perhaps. But I don't mind at all that Gangster Squad is ultimately the most worn-out trash, because that's exactly what attracted me to it. What bothers me is that it is nothing else, and in key plot twists it just rehashes bits and pieces from The Untouchables, Carlito's Way, and Public Enemies. (06/04/2013)

A simple action movie pretending to be a retro gangster film, where actors are illuminated like mannequins in a store. One or two thrilling scenes, a brisk pace, one-dimensional characters, attractive camera filters and a horribly directed Ryan Gosling. For him to fumble, the director’s skill must be truly abysmal. How could they have gotten such an acting ensemble for this screenplay?! Right between two and three stars, and I’m giving two because it’s a defiling of Sergio Leone and Brian De Palma. (24/01/2013)

After the first negative reactions, I was expecting some kind of dud, but it’s actually made very differently than I thought. No Scorsese and his typical precision, no De Palma and the great psychology of the characters, it’s only genre fan Ruben Fleischer who drew a Thompson on a paper instead of writing a script, shoved it into the hands of a bunch of top-notch actors, and let them go at it for nearly two hours in a style rivalled only by the recent Expendables 2. And all this against the backdrop of a very authentic retro atmosphere and Jablonsky's catchy soundtrack, which gives the action scenes more pizzazz. There’s one cliché after another, all the actors, except for the extremely scene-chewing Penn, get by with two expressions, and Emma Stone is just eye-candy that we could have done without this time. But, and this is quite important from my point of view in a product of film ENTERTAINMENT, you don't get bored for a moment. Admittedly, it’s a kind of guiltier entertainment, where we're well aware that we're witnessing an over-the-top, over-stylized and overly stupid Hollywood affair, but its negative impact on my humble viewing intelligence was ultimately not as overwhelming as I had feared. 65% (27/02/2013)

This modern approach is inappropriate. Moreover, Sean Penn completely overacted and Cohen became just a weird caricature. Thank God the casting of the team who are meant to lend him a hand is top-notch. Brolin is wonderfully obstinate, Gosling gives a standard performance and the Kurt-like Robert Patrick as the last gun-fighter in L.A. It lacks sophistication and intelligence, and modern slow-motion effects are sometimes impressive, but they begin to be bothersome after a while. A popcorn gangster movie cannot be filmed. Maybe it’s a also shame that the notorious scene in the movie theater disappeared. (09/04/2013)