Jack Reacher: Never Go Back

Zwick took it differently and badly. He seems to have abandoned the main strengths of the first one and serves us a second story of an agent with a mysterious past with a minimal portion of insight, which, however, does not so much play the main role, but only in details dilutes the damn serious note, which is itself the biggest criminal cliché in recent times. Unfortunately, even the screenwriting and framing of the story is first-rate Hollywood cynicism and dullness. In other words, you get all the ills that scripts for ordinary action films have, and as a result, all the twists and attempts fizzle out in the end. It's partly saved by the usually top-notch action Zwick has always been good at, but you'll still miss the slow, frantically unedited brawl from the first episode. Cruise is great, the family element is questionable and brings down the overall rating. After the first one, which caused a solid fan breakdown and there was talk of another agent like Bond and Hunt, came a cold shower and who knows what will happen with the third film. (23/10/2016)

A decent sequel. It’s obvious that Reacher is Tom’s favorite character. Rough as sand paper, a bit of a bull in a china shop, but a clever vet who always has the situation under control. Seeing part 1 encouraged me to read the series of books, so the much denied height disparity really bothers me, but also I’m surprised that he only makes films according to the inferior books in the series. I thought Never Go Back was just average (it disappeared from my mind terribly fast), and the only interesting storyline was with the kid. This made the movie an even more pleasant surprise. The brisker story, loads of old-school type action and great lines. Even the road trip moments work excellently. A pleasant return to the nineties. Tom is beginning to show his age, so he’s a bit puffy after the Men, but he convincingly walks all over the younger competition in fights, beating them hands down. A really fine ending. In terms of acting, well done. I hope Reacher earns enough for another sequel. These movies are evergreens, not box-office hits, but the type of movie you can watch more times during your life than many an Oscar-winner. (20/10/2016)

The first film definitely has its issues (the first half without tension, a number of unexplained things at the end), but so does this one, so I did not really notice any major qualitative drop. Perhaps only Kreamer's musical motif was a bit lacking for me, and the main villain could have been more charismatic. However, Tom Cruise is still convincing, Edward Zwick knows how to do the action and the other scenes, and that made me like the final restaurant unraveling in addition to the night shootout. (23/04/2017)

In my case, the fact that Cobie Smulders appears here helps a lot, as I really like her and always enjoy seeing her. It's quite action-packed, Tom Cruise doesn't seem to lose anything with age, or at least it's presented in a way that it looks like he doesn't lose anything. However, it is still a nice thriller mainstream. (18/04/2017)

After the previous installment, a descent into mediocrity. Granted, in addition to the standard running race, the viewer is also offered parkour, but also a stinking pile of action movie clichés on top of that. In order to beat the main villain, the hero must first get his ass kicked properly, the only move you know how to do will get you out of a tight spot, et cetera. I was also annoyed by the family play on emotions and the filmmakers’ attempt to convince me that after a head-on collision with a wall, all it takes is to clear your throat twice and your body instantly regenerates. I had to double-check if the film wasn’t directed by Jean-Claude van Damme. (13/04/2017)