The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

One of the best movies of all time. What else can I say? I've been crying for the past hour basically non-stop with it. Only "Big Fish" managed to evoke this in me, but only the first time. A beautiful culmination of the whole opus, to which even Peter Jackson himself could no longer match. Although maybe he will surprise us with the third part of "The Hobbit". I simply have no words for "The Return of the King". A magnificent film, where everything came together in the right place and at the right time. (28/01/2014)

A long shadow lies over the land, dark wings extend to the west. The tower is shaking; fate approaches the tombs of kings. The dead awaken; for the treacherous, the hour has come; they will stand again at the Stone of Erech and hear the horn's call from the mountains. Whose horn will it be? Who will summon them from the gray twilight, the forgotten nation? The heir to whom they swore. From the North he shall come, driven by desperation: he will pass through the doors of the Paths of the Dead. A magnificent film in every detail and the true culmination of the most beloved trilogy. The Return of the King is an emotionally charged punctuation mark to a gripping journey that has fundamentally changed my life. Each part is fully appreciable only after watching the extended version, but in the case of the final stage, it's not so much about plot twists as it is about the impact on emotions. The Healing Houses are a shining example that embodies my imagination from reading. And which part is the best? After four viewings out of five, I would say that the leading piece of the mosaic is The Fellowship, and the fifth time would be none other than The Return of the King, but The Lord of the Rings is in my eyes an invincible whole and the greatest saga in the history of cinematography. (23/12/2004)

The editing is too brutal, the characterization of the main protagonists changes during the movie, the ending is needlessly tearful and it’s dragged out maddeningly. But who care when there are so many incredibly powerful scenes that you only realize the downsides of the movie long after you have left the movie theater. This time the extended edition is half-way between interesting additional footage like with The Fellowship and a totally different (and better) movie like with The Two Towers. Some of the scenes added are pointless, but many of them do much to augment the movie as a whole. For instance, it is fascinating how a couple of extra sentences manage to give a completely different meaning to things and depth to the tragedy of Théoden’s fate than in the theatrical version. (29/04/2005)

In terms of filmmaking (the book is of course better) The Return of the King appears to be the weakest of the trilogy. Yes, the film is still excellent and deserves five stars, but it's not quite the same. The first part is something indescribably amazing, a film told at a slow pace, highlighting the monumental quest with visual and narrative sophistication; simply put, The Fellowship of the Ring is "something new". Peter Jackson couldn't rely on that in The Two Towers, but he solved it splendidly. The pace sped up, the atmosphere got darker, there’s more action (the amazing Battle of Helm's Deep) and the result was again breathtaking. But what about the third part? There was no more room for improvement. The atmosphere is somewhat gone, the battles are even bigger, grander, and more computer-generated, and simply put, it's not as impressive as before, and together it feels slightly disjointed. Despite all of that, it still deserves a full score because it concludes a brilliant trilogy, and rightfully it is the biggest and most megalomaniacal of all three parts, which is no small feat. (16/01/2004)

Like The Two Towers, it was initially stumbling and torn by "forced" cuts, but over time it’s utterly immersive. While the Fellowship will keep a primate intrigued by its great complexity, The Return of the King triumphs with a massive epic and, of course, a wonderful ending that is rather cheesy, but instead of artificiality and fabrication, it breathes a directorial love of the story and, in particular, realism on the part of actors, who often make up for minor defects in the craftsmanship. In the end, The Return of the King confirmed to me what I had felt before. The effects are nice, but if it wasn't for the heroes, this film would just be an inaccessible piece of ice. But it fascinates and consumes hundreds of thousands of people. A wonderful story in a beautiful garment, Peter Jackson bought a ticket to film heaven... P.S.: after the second viewing, I'm putting The Return of the King at the head of the trilogy. If the film can impress me so powerfully a second time, it's a sign of high quality. Nirvana. P.S.S. The extended version is slowly deserving a sixth star, as even the slightly intermittent tempo and unnatural editing become a thing of the past, the characters get even more space, the plot a deeper motivation, and the traditionally perverted humor of the Gimli-Legolas duo is also there. See and die! (25/01/2004)