Den of Thieves

The film begins with an assault of an armoured car by a gang of masked robbers. Seems like the operation is perfectly conducted, until one of the blokes loses it and shoots one of the witnesses, leading to an uncontrolled bloodshed (doesn’t that sound familiar?). Then arrives on the scene a group of cops whose tough commander has family problems due to his zealous work, his wife giving him a hard time (is it ringing a bell already?). This is followed by alternating scenes depicting the characters’ personal lives, police pursuits, the robbery preparation and, at the same time, the peculiar relationship that develops between one of the thieves and the policeman. What comes next is the story-central perfect robbery, in which some loud and long shooting happens between cops and thieves, all culminating in a ruthless duel between the two main antagonists… and in the cringy realisation that we’re far beyond mere inspiration from Heat, we’re literally in a den of thieves! Finally, so as to spare the creators of being impacted and accused of complete duplication of one movie, there’s the last ten minutes which, for a change, steal from another notoriously famous thriller from the ’90s! But apparently, no one cares. Den of Thieves is still blessed by a good technical level, excellent action scenes and decent casting. But this outrageous cloning cannot just be overlooked. Gudegast is a plagiarist. (08/06/2018)

Gudegast has a real weakness for the duo of crime classics from the year 95. And he doesn't even try to hide it, in other words, he does his best to imitate them, from stylization to the course to individual twists. Yes, it is a “wannabe" tribute to the two classic movies made by a routine guy with no inventiveness more than anything else, but even such a second-rate non-original genre move can make you happy. And the movie is really good at it, because it hit exactly the pure essence of uncompromising macho rough crime movies. It just slightly slavishly copied scenes from the original movies, so you always know “what´s going on and what to expect". The movie should have been a little bit shorter and should have skipped Nick's family vicissitudes (they're not bad, but annoyingly clichéd and useless because nothing comes out of them), because they just obstruct an otherwise entirely nice and straightforward spectacle. It is exactly that type of manly movies, for which we used to go to video rentals in the 1990s. Moreover, this one is so good that it could almost keep up with the competition at the time. (06/01/2019)

We finally know how Heat could have looked like if Michael Mann hadn't directed it. What's missing here is the precision of direction, the plot sweep, the feel of concrete, the neon of LA and above all the depth and fatality of the characters. Macho Butler is over the top and Schreiber as a villain, though contrived, needed a more resonant persona. The most interesting character is 50 Cent, thanks to his family background. The original is the materialised reality of everyday life, but this copy is "just a film" that also tends to repeat the classics in places. For example, in the end, and then in the opening thrilling ambush of the armoured car. (15/04/2018)

In comparison with Butler’s movies in which he plays a Secret Service agent protecting American presidents, Den of Thieves is a revelation. It’s a gritty crime flick with tough cops acting like gangsters and bad guys who, though they look like prison thugs, know how to always stay one step ahead of the law. The main bank robbery (particularly its setting) is a good idea in the screenplay and the shootouts are properly realistic. The film borrows a lot from the classic Heat, but twenty years later. Mainly, however, if it’s a B-movie version of Mann’s classic, then it’s a damn good B-movie version. (24/12/2019)

The script has more holes than a Swiss cheese, which you can see especially during the well narrated heist and then the final twist, which is anything but clever, even though it wanted to be something like The Usual Suspects. And what do we have otherwise? A clash of two strong personalities and a story that relies on atmosphere rather than action, which we only see at the beginning and the very end. So it's a kind of second-rate Heat, and Butler is no Al Pacino, Schreiber is nowhere near a DeNiro-type personality and Gudegast can’t hold a candle to Mann. But if don’t compare, then the emphasis on the characters, the slower pace, the atmospheric realities of L.A., and the ultra-macho Butler as we want to see him, all sat well enough with me and I'll give the four slightly overrated stars, despite the botched twist. (16/05/2018)