For a Few Dollars More

One of the main plots of Once Upon a Time in the West, "Someone is going after someone, but it's not until the end that we find out why," was used by Leone here. It would seem that Clint's Monco is playing second fiddle in For a Few Dollars More... But he simply isn’t able to do that and he is great and draws attention to himself as always.__P.S.: Van Cleef is traditionally good, of course, but I like him even better as a villain.__P.P.S. I recommend listening to the soundtracks from A Fistful of Dollars, For a Few Dollars More and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. The way Morricone develops and refines his music over time, how he interweaves individual motifs and makes them into an unforgettable work, deserves incredible admiration. (18/09/2007)

Once again, the flawless Leone and his other contribution to the highlights of the western genre, which stands a little unfairly in the shadow of The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. In addition to the traditionally excellent direction, script and music, the film is mainly driven by Clint Eastwood and Lee Van Cleef, who, as two rival bounty hunters, create a dangerous and "hellishly fast" central duo that I definitely wouldn't want to cross paths with. The story is not as extensive as in The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, but everything is made up for by the perfect atmosphere full of charged colts, delicious man-on-man fights and the character of the two mentioned "antiheroes", who spare smiles, but give joy to every genre fan. I have nothing to complain about, definitely my favorite western after Once Upon a Time in the West :) (21/04/2011)

The second film from the so-called "Dollars Trilogy", at least in the order in which they were filmed. Sergio Leone, Ennio Morricona, and Clint Eastwood return to show the world that it is possible to shoot a damn good Western in Italy, and it doesn't matter that the film will be two hours long, on the contrary, it is just the right amount of time, maybe even a little too little. In this performance, the Western will truly entertain you. In addition to the brilliant music by Leone's court composer Morricone, the film also has other attributes that were crucial to its legendary status. It is solid direction that does not waver, but of course, it is also the story that may seem like a simple hunt for outlaws, a hunt for man-hunters, but it is mainly about the characters and how they are written and played. Each character here has their bright and dark side. People die here for no reason, children and women die. Evil does not choose, that's just how it is. But even the biggest villain is not without a heart, there is something in him that influenced him, that made him what he is today. Although Clint Eastwood is the star of Leone's films, in this case, he is somewhat overshadowed by another actor, who is none other than Lee Man Cleef, a man with a gaze that could pierce you. This duo fits perfectly by the fact that their characters do not fit. It is definitely not a classic buddy movie, like "Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid," but still, the element of their relationship is very important. Also important are the shooting skills. We will see classic duels in a new, interesting way, each one will be suspenseful and interesting for you. The wait for the shot is almost endless, but when the shot actually falls, it is exactly as you expected. However, this does not prevent you from truly eagerly waiting. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2013/01/divosi-10-years-divoka-stvoreni-lets.html (05/03/2013)

I have resolved the dilemma of whether A Fistful of Dollars or For a Few Dollars is better because I consider the second film to be more mature. Leone had already found his style by that point and he had refined his collaboration with Ennio Morricone to the point that there isn't much to criticize about the direction and overall filmmaking craftsmanship of the film. Sergio Leone's merit is in revitalizing the dying western genre by tarnishing it, lightening it with comedic elements, creatively working with genre stereotypes, and imprinting characters on previously interchangeable supporting roles. In short, he made it more entertaining. On the other hand, his early westerns have issues in their screenplays. When you look at the motivation of his heroes and their thought processes, you have a collection of unique idiots in front of you. If the main villain Callaway possessed ideas such as releasing his prisoners to eliminate members of his gang, he probably wouldn't have survived puberty. Leone simply made undemanding B-grade movies for the mass audience and, unfortunately for him, he had ambitions to move toward more serious filmmaking statements and more serious genres, which happened with his legendary film Once Upon a Time in America. That says something about the film industry and its viewers, not about Sergio Leone. Overall impression: 65%. (12/10/2011)

A memory: I’m about 13-14 years old and I’m resting on the sofa after a hearty lunch. Dad is watching a western on TV and I have half an eye on it too. Then that melody of the pocket watch began to chime and totally captivated me. I couldn’t get it out of my head for like ten years... For a few dollars more is a story about Lee Van Cleef’s Colonel Mortimer than about Clint’s Monk with the snappy lines, but they are given more or less the same amount of room. Leone raises his standard, develops the main characters more and offers a higher quality plot. Really, really good. (06/09/2009)