Plots(1)

In the year 2035, technology and robots are a trusted part of everyday life. But that trust is broken when a scientist is found dead and a skeptical detective (Smith) believes that a robot is responsible. Bridget Moynahan co-stars in this high-tech action thriller that questions whether technology will ultimately lead to mankind's salvation . . . or annihilation. (20th Century Fox UK)

(more)

Videos (4)

Trailer 2

Reviews (8)

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English I, Robot is a spectacular, technically flawless action flick for mainstream popcorn fans, but even more discerning viewers will enjoy it. But any talk of highly intelligent entertainment in the mold of Minority Report is out of line. The film’s screenplay is simple and unsophisticated, with banal dialogue and a sizable portion of clichés. The screenplay is brought up to the level of high-quality entertainment only by director Alex Proyas, thanks to whom the result is dynamic enough not to be boring, and paranoid and disturbing enough to be enthralling. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English I saw the movie as a hot novelty in the cinema in 2004 and I was absolutely thrilled by it. As a sci-fi enthusiast, I have to constantly stand by the fact that the movie has an idea and by using Asimov's laws, it only points out the classic problem associated with robots. How far can we go with artificial intelligence before it turns against us? Well, the ending is a bit shaky, but otherwise, this is an excellent action ride with a good detective plot, and considering the movie is already 10 years old, it has great special effects sequences. ()

Ads

DaViD´82 

all reviews of this user

English Although this is Proyas’ worst ever picture, it is still on a high quality level. It’s proof that a “summer blockbuster" isn’t always necessarily a dumb movie that you have to switch off your brain for and suffer laboring through two hours of movie just to see a quarter hour of new generation CGI effects. I have two fundamental objections to make and neither of them is “regular". Firstly I’m unsure of what this has to do with Asimov. If you’ve read his books, you will be disappointed with it, if not, then the name will mean nothing to you. Apart from the three laws of robotics (which are ignored here anyhow), a couple of names and one pleasant nod in the factory, we get no hint of Asimov. My second objection concerns Alex himself for abandoning his habit of making cult movies not made just for the masses. The first objection just surprises me, but the second is understandable, because he wanted to film an action sci-fi that would enjoy commercial success and he succeeded in that to the maximum. ()

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English At first, I took a long time to get used to the unusual form, but the second projection confirmed a visually refined spectacle and a thought-provoking story. Proyas rocks again, Smith is in top form like never before, and Sonny is the best partner I can imagine. Over the years, Robot has also become almost a classic because there are not many action movies combined with a clever thriller side. ()

Lima 

all reviews of this user

English A very solid film with flawless special effects that I believe will not become a sci-fi classic like, for instance, Blade Runner. It lacks a deeper dimension of thought for that, its ambition is only to entertain, nothing more. Which, of course, is no small feat, and it delivers without problem. The futuristic vision was very impressive, some of it really amused me, because the horizon of 30 years is not that far away, the creators really let their imagination run wild in places. Will Smith with his swagger is an advert for testosterone, some of the action sequences were outstanding (especially Smith's duel with the robots in the tunnel) and the whole thing ran like a Swiss watch without a hitch. Cool. ()

Gallery (153)