Tomorrowland

Cute, a little bit stupid, non-offensive. What more can I say about Tomorrowland? I can see that the movie had great ambitions; digitally, it was amazing and George Clooney wouldn’t take just any gig, but the overall story is so strange that it’s actually a good thing that they only ended up shooting one movie. The first time, it was okay with my eyes half-closed, but if I were to watch it again, I’d have to have a blindfold on. (22/11/2016)

The promise of something gigantic, luring you to the world of the future isn’t quite fulfilled at the end. It leads more to dystopia. This is one of those old school fairytales that are fine, but I can’t shake the feeling that they could be better. Clooney wasn’t right here and the young cutie is certainly no child. Laurie dominates (although not so much at the end) and the effects are super. Don’t be put off by the criticism. Despite my reservations, I liked it a lot. P.S.: I was pleased about the band of acquaintances from Stargate and the geeky merch in the store. (16/12/2015)

Brad Bird already proved in The Iron Giant that he has a flair for retro children's stories. Tomorrowland continues with a tribute to the 1960s and the futuristic positivism of the time. And like Saving Mr. Banks, it's a story from real Disney history. Which in and of itself is fascinating. (01/10/2019)

I had quite a few laughs and a lot of fun watching this, especially thanks to the slightly pedophilic aging inventor Frank with his house full of surprises and Hugh Laurie as the villain. Britt Robertson was also great here, unlike in The Space Between Us. The story had a decent pace. It’s just that the over-the-top politically correct ending was about as enjoyable as if the filmmakers had slapped me with a dead mackerel. (23/08/2017)

Underrated, by a lot. Proper family sci-fi with an offbeat story that, given the push and pull of its child protagonists, surprises with earnestly conceived and scripted themes about the dangers posed by humans to life on our blue planet. It doesn't go very deep, and given the visually impressive concept of its world, we can talk about wasted potential at some points, especially since much of the runtime is taken up by dialogue, but the important thing is that each line moves the plot somewhere and the film as a whole feels complex, uncluttered and with a clear vision that may not appeal to everyone. But personally, I was impressed with Brad Bird and his inventive and broadly accessible narrative methods (admittedly with minor fluctuations) from start to finish. I wasn't expecting much, but I got not only a whirlwind of enjoyable performances from all sides, but above all the sheer joy of storytelling, a huge desire to convey a positive story of hope in a way that is contagious to the viewer.... And for that I’m grateful. 75% (10/10/2015)