The Lobster

With its cast of well-known actors and relatively comprehensible core story of forbidden love, The Lobster is Lanthimos’s most accessible film. At the same time, however, it is as comparably sharp in its satire, visually distinctive and unclassifiable in terms of genre as his earlier work, which was intended exclusively for the festival circuit. ___ The use of static shots, faded cold colours and passages from classical compositions played by string quartets adds disturbing undertones to the absurdist plot and prepares us for displays of instinctive aggression, which are shocking despite the fact that we don’t directly see most of them. The scenes of death and dying are filmed with the same cold detachment as the dialogue spoken by the actors without a hint of any emotion (which makes it even funnier). As a result, The Lobster is also strange in that it doesn’t draw attention to its strangeness. The transformation of people into animals seems as natural as the regular hunts for loners. ___ However, every protest has its own rules, which in the end can be just as restrictive as those against which we originally defined ourselves, as seen in the second half of the film. The ideology of the couple is replaced by an ideology of extreme individualism. Those who fail in their search for a partner are paradoxically punished by not being allowed to find one. As in A Clockwork Orange, the greatest evil here consists in the impossibility of free choice. Those who lose the possibility to make their own decisions also lose their individuality. This is precisely the aim of all repressive systems, including the one that Lanthimos invented for his film. ___ By taking the opportunistic logic of interpersonal interaction to extremes, Lanthimos exposes the mechanisms through which not only relationships, but essentially society as a whole function, at least outwardly. According to his bleak vision, people are condemned to an absence of freedom resulting from the unrelenting fear of what others think of them. At least the short-term solution to unsatisfying romantic cohabitation is to invent one’s own way of communicating that is not guided by the dominant ideology and is not based on rules that are social constructs (even though we perceive them as something natural). ___ Like in Dogtooth and Alps, the hermetically sealed microcosm of humanity serves Lanthimos as an experimental laboratory in which thought-provoking things happen, but which do not hold together well enough from the storytelling perspective. This was surely partly intentional. The use of various alienating devices (the omniscient narrator, the counterpoint of music and image) constantly pulls us out of the narrative and prevents us from simply enjoying the film. However, this can eventually lead to disinterest in the characters and what they are going through. ___ The considerations that The Lobster inspires keep us more engaged than the story that it tells. In my opinion, the recent Anomalisa is proof that it is possible to make an entertaining, relatively accessible and emotionally engaging film that also keeps an appropriate distance from its characters and thus works more with ideas than with emotions. Its protagonist is also punished for his solitariness, just in a less visible way than The Lobster’s David. 80% (03/04/2016) (less) (more)