Logan Lucky

I've been quite fond of Soderbergh's films lately, but Logan Lucky didn't do it for me at all. It's shot really well, and there's an attempt to capture the Southern setting, which it did, but plot-wise I just didn't enjoy the film and I didn't relate to the individual characters. It was a bit boring for me in that regard. (03/12/2017)

An indie take on Ocean’s Eleven. It has spark, the unobtrusive elegance of the central gang with the exuberance of rednecks instead of neon, the countryside and hot babes (Riley Keough, Katie Holmes). It’s not quite a dud, but unlike the elegant version of a heist, it's less watchable and more niche for a specific target audience who will enjoy this down-to-earth setting full of mongs and lots of deliberately absurd scenes. The second half is a notch better than the first with the introductions. (03/02/2018)

“They’re going to know what we want them to know.” Logan Lucky is an inventive and humorous mix of a social drama from working-class life and a heist film, a prison-escape flick and a movie about swindling, where mainly the viewer is the one being conned. There is no traditional antagonist whom the protagonists would try to outwit. It is not until the final act that the narrative is enhanced with a character who goes for the throat of the gang around Jimmy (and who is played by an actress famous enough for you to suspect that she won’t simply give up), thanks to which the film is thrilling even after the action. Soderbergh doesn’t cut directly to the chase and, in the opening part of the film, spends a relatively long time on developing the characters and fleshing out their social environment (thus the two-hour runtime makes sense), which he puts to good use in the emotionally charged climax, when I found myself alternating between emotion, amusement and (eventually) dismay in quick succession. Thanks to meaningful “backstories”, understandable motivations and a well-chosen cast, Logan Lucky, unlike other crime comedies, doesn’t lose its persuasiveness even when it asks us to sympathise with characters who sometimes say and do strange things, but for the most part, they are not one-dimensional comedic characters and their behaviour is relatively consistent throughout the film. Even charmingly bizarre, mostly unexplained moments, such as the password “cauliflower” and the taking of a bag from the “bear’, and moments that are entertaining because they are explained in too much detail (making a bomb out of gummy bears) fit flawlessly with the poetic nature of the film. As usual, Soderbergh takes extra care to ensure that nothing that happens in the film comes across as random (without motivation). As gradually becomes apparent, the film is well thought out down to the smallest detail. Soderbergh very skilfully utilises the protagonist’s favourite song, the character of his former classmate, the fact that he doesn’t own a mobile telephone and the special “salt” that Joe Bang sprinkles on his boiled eggs. The careful composition with very clever distribution of information goes hand in hand with Soderbergh’s patient direction of individual scenes. He knows exactly when to cut (and, conversely, when to stay in one place with the camera), where to place the camera so that the shot not only tells us everything important but is also funny, and how to shoot action so that we don’t lose our bearings in the given space. Logan Lucky may appear to be a mere first-class genre movie, but it offers so many premium “services” that I have no problem giving it a full five-star rating and ranking it among this year’s most satisfying cinematic experiences. 90% (31/08/2017)

A film about a bunch of assholes, completely different from the usual Hollywood films. The Logan brothers are retarded. One is all muscles and the other one is missing a hand, so he is truly crippled. For their break-in gang they also recruit Daniel Craig, who is at the time sitting in jail with one last month of desperate staring into the wall left. However, they come up with an idea how to take him along, even though he is in jail, which gives the whole thing an absurd dimension. The film is funny at times, especially when there is a rebellion in jail because they do not have the newest volume of The Game of Thrones source book series in their library. Otherwise, it is your usual average film. For a while the absurdity reminded me of the Coen brothers’ stories, the only difference being that their characters and dialogues are way funnier than in this film. (27/01/2018)

Steven Soderberg has never convinced me with his direction, but I loved this redneck version of Ocean’s Eleven. A very entertaining and likeable film with an enjoyable cast (Channing Tatum, Daniel Craig and Hilary Swank are excellent) and quite possibly one of the most thoughtful and original heist films I've ever had the opportunity to see. There's the occasional funny scene, no shortage of tension, great chemistry between the characters and I really stared with rapt attention for the final 40 minutes. A very nice surprise, I hadn't even hoped for such satisfaction. Almost 5 stars. 85%. (16/11/2017)