1922

1922 suffers from the syndrome that a number of King's adaptations have. The author uses paranormal and horror elements to deepen the dilemmas and mental states of the characters, to amplify the drama, which otherwise has a "non-horror origin". At its core, 1922 is a hard ballad about guilt and remorse, a drama about a man's love for his son and his country that prevails over love for the mother. Despite the great visuals and good cast, the drama is very lame, it drags on and helps itself powerfully with Thomas Jane's voice-over. In particular, Wilf's conflict with his son is not intense enough that one experiences the subsequent "cellar revelation" as strongly as the director planned. Rats and ghosts simply look more like B-movie props and the conspicuous utterance of something that is otherwise closely tied to the inner core of the main character. As a redneck, Thomas Jane is sufficiently photogenic, but his performance certainly does not have (and cannot have) the parameters of a deeper drama. 1922 stays in its comfort zone, and the same goes for Mike Patton's soundtrack. Solid work, but a marginal result. (22/10/2017)

A rare spectacle, where the template is a melancholic gloomy story from the olden days, where distress leads a man of simple values to a desperate act, after which everything begins to deteriorate – and the adaptation is a melancholic gloomy story from the olden days, when the exact same thing happens. Perhaps the fact that Stephen King's novella is relatively short is to blame for it, but all the unforgettable images that I couldn't get out of my head even after years are here with the same power as on paper. The act, the cow, the trumpet, the visions, the hand, the revelation, and the finale. In both media, this ballad about a Nebraska farm suffers only from the fact that it mainly thrives on atmosphere and, in terms of plot, never quite surprises. (04/04/2021)

It’s fascinating how well Thomas Jane rehearsed his role of a total American redneck, including the melodious but barely comprehensible dialect. Really fascinating. Unfortunately, even though it’s based on a short story by Stephen King, which guarantees the quality of the topic, its execution was too gloomy and horribly slow. Given that the film lasts 101 minutes, nothing much happens in it, apart from one explicit scene. Everything else rises and falls with the atmosphere of 1922, and I must admit that’s very authentic. Undoubtedly an interesting piece, which has its pros and cons but is definitely worth watching. Moreover, you can’t miss several references to the legendary The Shining. For Stephen King’s fans, this film is definitely a must-see. (16/04/2020)

I have to admit the film was a huge disappointment. The beginning was great, Thomas Jane sounded like he was born wearing overalls on a farm somewhere in the middle of nowhere, the 1920s atmosphere was great, and I was enjoying it. But after a while, the creators seemed to have run out of material and they didn’t figure out a way to save the situation. They let the main character be literally gnawed by remorse, but the last third of the film was incredibly boring, and, after a very good start, it took a massive downturn. 3*- (11/08/2020)

1922 is actually a simple story about how a farmer wanted to get rid of his wife, but it all went horribly wrong because she was still capable of causing evil even after death. However, 1922 is not so much based on King's novel, but rather on the performance of Thomas Jane, who shows that he should definitely not be underestimated. (27/01/2018)